Skip to main content

Humanist churches

What does it say about human nature in general, and Americans in particular, that there are such things as atheist churches. For most people this would seem like an oxymoron. I'm sure most people in Britain, the general public, and humanists, would consider it really really weird that Americans have atheist/humanist churches.
There are humanists organisations in Britain, but I'm sure none of them meet on Sunday morning, have 'sermons' 'leaders' and 'sunday schools.' What does it say about how much Americans love going to church, that even those that are entirely atheists, still go to church?
Why is American church-going culture so strong that it survives the complete removal of any metaphysical foundation?
Here's a fun party game: listen to an audio sermon online, and see if you can work out if it's a UU church or an Ethical Society. What does it mean if you can't?
A lot of questions.


Freespirit said…
Equating atheism and humanism opens a big can of worms. Humanism is such a comprehensive term that it embraces both religious and secular. I would argue that all Unitarianism (and UU'ism) has a humanistic thread, but not all of it is atheistic...because we place the center of the quest for truth and meaning in the hearts, minds and hands of unique, individual human beings.
Anonymous said…
another stereotyping post... such a narrow-minded 'look at me I'm a liberal' viewpoint...

what happened to the INTELLECTUAL tradition of British Unitarianism? When was is taken over by Guardianistas?
Anonymous said…
When you get to Unitarian College Manchester, look in its little library section of Luther King House's for the Ethical Church liturgy book. Traces of it and inspirations from it are on my website.

Yes, I was at UCM. I see some of your comments to be similar to my outlook, including I note a rather recent "conversion" to Unitarianism. Are you sure you know what those Manchester churches are like? With a few exceptions, I found their conservatism like death warmed up, and they did not like me either. I see you are already theologically capable, and have an Anglo-Catholic element in your background. Have you not considered that liberalism in Unitarianism can be conservative, whereas the same liberalism and more can be radical elsewhere? I notice your dislike of Hymns of Faith and Freedom, an example of Unitarian conservative attitudes, and yet your liking for the eucharist. Why?

Popular posts from this blog

From liberalism to radicalism

I've been reflecting recently on the journey I've been making from liberalism to radicalism, and how I'm beginning to see it as a necessary evolution if you're not going to get stuck in a kind of immature liberalism that fails to serve both you and the world. By liberalism I mean ideas and movements that emphasise personal freedom and not being restricted by the patterns of the past. By radicalism I mean ideas and movements that emphasise justice, solidarity, and liberation from oppression. Yes, I'm using broad categories here. Let me give an example. Let's talk about sexual liberation in a Western context for example. We can talk about women getting more agency over their bodies; gay and bi people being able to have sex with one another and marry one another; we can talk about the work of overcoming shame around sexuality. All of that is liberalism. It's good stuff. It's still ongoing. So we might ask the question "where next for sexu

Am I an activist?

  I remember being at some protest outside the Senedd once, and someone introduced me to someone else, and said, "Stephen is an activist." I remember thinking - am I? I don't know. What does it mean to be an activist? Who gets to use that title? Am I an activist because I turn up at a few protests? Or do I have to be one them organising the protest to be an activist? Do I have to lead? Do I have to do the organisational work to be an activist? Because the truth is that since I moved to Cardiff I have kept myself at the periphery of a lot of activist groups. I go to meetings, I hear about things, I turn up at protests, but I have rarely got really fully involved. Why is that? It's not for the reason that I don't have time. I do, in fact. But often I sit in these meetings and protests and think "Is this effective? Is it worthwhile? Is it going to produce something at the end of it all that is worth the effort?" I suppose, coming from the world of church I

LOST and theology: who are the good guys?

***Spoiler alert*** I'm continuing some theological/philosophical reflections while re-watching the series LOST. One of the recurring themes in LOST is the idea of the "good guys" and the "bad guys." We start the series assuming the survivors (who are the main characters) are the "good guys" and the mysterious "Others" are definitely bad guys. But at the end of series 2 one of the main characters asks the Others, "Who are  you people?" and they answer, in an extremely disturbing way, "We're the good guys." The series develops with a number of different factions appearing, "the people from the freighter" "the DHARMA initiative" as well as divisions among the original survivors. The question remains among all these complicated happenings "who really are the good guys?" I think one of the most significant lines in the series is an episode when Hurley is having a conversation with