Skip to main content

Progressive AND Contemplative

The older I get (I'm now 42) the more I find myself convinced of the need for faith that is not just progressive/liberal but also contemplative. And the more frustrated I find myself at the lack of communities that truly are both progressive and contemplative. 

Progressive Christianity without a spiritual contemplative heart tends to get stuck in its own head (or in more colourful language, perhaps stuck up its own arse). It tends to be quite... boring, quite stuck, very heady and intellectual. People just say the same thing again and again and again. It defines itself only in negative terms: "we're not homophobic," "we don't believe in taking the Bible literally." But it finds very little to say positively. If it says anything beyond negatives it can just drop into banalities, dropping Christian language completely and talking about gardening or knitting or things like that. Not that I have anything against gardening or knitting. It's just at that point you might as well just join a gardening club, or read books about gardening. Religion has ceased to be religion.

When faced with conservative religious cultures the progressive approach remains vibrant enough because it has a sense of mission in opposing such culture and a steady stream of refugees from conservative religion to swell the ranks. It is more political. There's nothing wrong with this, I'm all for politically engaged justice-seeking faith. It's just without the contemplative element the risk of burnout is high. 

And so progressive forms of religion fail. Despite seeing their purpose as being "a more credible modern faith" they actually only attract a tiny tiny minority of people, while conservative religion, or simply unapologetically ancient forms of religion, thrive, or at least survive a little better.

My observation of progressive Christianity is that it tends to evolve in a certain way. When a person, or even a church or denomination, starts on the pathway of progressive Christianity, this is what tends to happen:

  • You can remain stuck in a negative story of what you have rejected and just continue to repeat ad nauseum "we're not this, we're not this, we're not this." 
  • You can find community in those others who have been through the same process of rejecting conservative faith, so much so that the friendship of that community is all that matters. You're no longer really interested in the faith side, it's just that your friends are in this church/group and you enjoy it. Of course that's fine as far as it goes but it doesn't appeal to anyone beyond the life of a particular group.
  • Your faith can just become synonymous with your politics. You campaign, you stand up for certain things, but though you label it with "faith" it's not really any different from someone doing these things while not claiming it as faith.
  • You can just drift away from faith altogether. You either hold on to your religious trauma, or you don't (you do your work, you work through your trauma therapeutically) but at the end you find you don't really have much interest in faith community in any sense. You get on with your life. 
  • You find yourself still searching for that "something more", and you find it outside of Christianity, maybe in some form of Buddhism. Maybe it's because a new faith doesn't hold any of the trauma of your old faith. Or maybe it's because the new faith more coherently and clearly offers you a spiritual practice that you intuit does really bring a deeper feeling of liberation and happiness. 
  • Or, your hunger leads you to search more deeply within Christianity for the inner mystical tradition. You have moved beyond the certainty of intellectual fundamentalism but find something that feels solid in contemplative Christianity. It's not solid like stone, but it is, mysteriously, solid like air. You're not holding onto the stone of old certainties, but delightfully, you discover you don't need them, because this whole time you had the ability to fly. 

Many of these options aren't terrible. Some of them (the ones where you're stuck) will probably leave you somewhat unhappy. Being healed and embracing no faith or another faith may will give you happiness and liberation. But I believe the only way Christian faith actually survives and thrives is if it finds, and practices, a contemplative approach.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What does it mean to be non-creedal?

Steve Caldwell says "The problem here isn't humanism vs. theism for theist Unitarian Universalists -- it's the non-creedal nature of Unitarian Universalism" This is a good point. We need to think much more deeply about what it means to be a non-creedal religion. The first thing I want to say is that there is more than one possible understanding of non-creedalism. The Disciples of Christ are a non-creedal church, they say here : " Freedom of belief. Disciples are called together around one essential of faith: belief in Jesus Christ as Lord and Savior. Persons are free to follow their consciences guided by the Bible, the Holy Spirit study and prayer, and are expected to extend that freedom to others." Quakers are also non-creedal and say here : Quakers have no set creed or dogma - that means we do not have any declared statements which you have to believe to be a Quaker. There are, however, some commonly held views which unite us. One accepted view is that th

What is Radical Christianity?

Radical Christianity is about encountering the God of love . It is first and foremost rooted in the discovery of a universal and unconditional source of love at the heart of reality and within each person. God is the name we give to this source of love. It is possible to have a direct and real personal encounter with this God through spiritual practice. We encounter God, and are nourished by God, through the regular practice of prayer, or contemplation.  Radical Christianity is about following a man called Jesus . It is rooted in the teaching of Jesus of Nazareth, a Jewish prophet living under occupation of the Roman Empire two thousand years ago. It understands that's Jesus' message was the message of liberation. His message was that when we truly encounter God, and let God's love flow through us, we begin to be liberated from the powers of empire and violence and encounter the  "realm of God" - an alternative spiritual and social reality rooted in love rather th

Drop the Free Christian!

Let me preface what I'm going to say by first saying this: I am a Christian. It's taken me a long time to be able to say that, and to know what I mean by that, and I'm very lucky that in the Unitarian church I have been given the space to come to that decision in my own time, on my own terms. But I am a Christian, I'm more Christian now than I have been for years. Now: I want us to drop this "Free Christian" from our title. It's a silly phrase that we need to get rid of. Why? "The General Assembly of Unitarian and Free Christian Churches" is a long and unwieldy title. It would be much better if we traded under something like "Unitarians in Britain." It gives the impression that there are two separate and distinct groups: "Unitarians" and "Free Christians," this is not the case. It's not that there are Unitarians (who are not Christians) and "Free Christians" who are not Unitarians. There are not two dif