Skip to main content

Management vs Leadership

"Management is a set of processes that can keep a complicated system of people and technology running smoothly. The most important aspects of management include planning, budgeting, organising, staffing, controlling, and problem solving.

Leadership is a set of processes that creates organisations in the first place or adapts them to significantly changing circumstances. Leadership defines what the future should look like, aligns people with that vision, and inspires them to make it happen despite the obstacles."

John Kotter



The problem with British Unitarianism, locally and nationally, is that we do management rather than leadership.

Comments

Robertson said…
Stephen writes:-
"The problem with British Unitarianism, locally and nationally, is that we do management rather than leadership."It has been so for a long time - at least 30 years in my experience - now it has become the management of decline in all but a few significant places.I think that the same applies to the Methodists and the URC - the latter now smaller than either of the two constituent churches that formed it in the sixties.Unitarianism with its emphasis upon private judgement in matters of faith and its diversity of belief - it's not so much non-credal as multi-credal- is too nuanced to appeal beyond a relatively sophisticated and well educated minority and many of those would find little sustenance in many of our churches.
12:21 pm
Angela @ liveunitarianly.com said…
Few of us are gifted at leadership - I am not for example. Sadly, it's true to say that I have been more inspired by the vision of a good CEO at work, than I have by any Unitarian.

Our structure does not naturally lend itself to leadership. Independence is highly valued, and everyone has a different opinion. It's hard for leadership to flourish.

OTOH it would be a mistake to underestimate the importance of management and dismiss it as bean counting of one description or another.
4:01 pm
Stephen Lingwood said…
Angela,

I'm less convinced today that leadership is about "gifts" (innate). I'm more inclined today to think that leadership is about "skills" which can be learnt by most people.
5:20 pm
Angela @ liveunitarianly.com said…
Sorry, yes,leadership skills can be learned. But, I've noticed that some people can naturally lead a crowd and others can't and need to lean on their position/reputation.

You would need a lot of reputation or natural talent to lead Unitarians. It's a tough crowd.
11:41 pm
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Radical?

When I started this blog nearly 4 years and nearly 300 posts ago one of the labels I used for it/me was "radical." Perhaps I used it a little unreflectively. Recently I've been pondering what radical means. A couple of things have made me think of this. Firstly this blog series from my friend Jeremy, which explores a distinction between "radical progressives" and "rational progressives." There is also this definition of radical, liberal and conservative from Terry Eagleton quoted at Young Anabaptist Radicals : “Radicals are those who believe that things are extremely bad with us, but they could feasibly be much improved. Conservatives believe that things are pretty bad, but that’s just the way the human animal is. And liberals believe that there’s a little bit of good and bad in all of us.” What interests me is finding a way to express the tension I feel sometimes between myself and the wider Unitarian movement. One way to express this is to say I tend
3 comments
Read more

What does it mean to be non-creedal?

Steve Caldwell says "The problem here isn't humanism vs. theism for theist Unitarian Universalists -- it's the non-creedal nature of Unitarian Universalism" This is a good point. We need to think much more deeply about what it means to be a non-creedal religion. The first thing I want to say is that there is more than one possible understanding of non-creedalism. The Disciples of Christ are a non-creedal church, they say here : " Freedom of belief. Disciples are called together around one essential of faith: belief in Jesus Christ as Lord and Savior. Persons are free to follow their consciences guided by the Bible, the Holy Spirit study and prayer, and are expected to extend that freedom to others." Quakers are also non-creedal and say here : Quakers have no set creed or dogma - that means we do not have any declared statements which you have to believe to be a Quaker. There are, however, some commonly held views which unite us. One accepted view is that th
3 comments
Read more

What is Radical Christianity?

Radical Christianity is about encountering the God of love . It is first and foremost rooted in the discovery of a universal and unconditional source of love at the heart of reality and within each person. God is the name we give to this source of love. It is possible to have a direct and real personal encounter with this God through spiritual practice. We encounter God, and are nourished by God, through the regular practice of prayer, or contemplation.  Radical Christianity is about following a man called Jesus . It is rooted in the teaching of Jesus of Nazareth, a Jewish prophet living under occupation of the Roman Empire two thousand years ago. It understands that's Jesus' message was the message of liberation. His message was that when we truly encounter God, and let God's love flow through us, we begin to be liberated from the powers of empire and violence and encounter the  "realm of God" - an alternative spiritual and social reality rooted in love rather th
Post a Comment
Read more