Skip to main content

Happy St George's Day!


It's time we reclaimed St George's Day. It should be a bank holiday in England, and a day to celebrate the English traditions of dissent, and fighting for democracy and religious freedom.

St George was definitely not English, and definitely not white. He was born in what is now Turkey, and so is an immigrant to this country.

St George was a soldier in the Roman army. He went to the Roman emperor, without an army, without a sword, and challenged him personally to stop persecuting Christians. The emperor imprisoned him and beheaded him.

So the story of Saint George is one of dissent and challenge to power; it is one of fighting for the rights of minorities; and fighting for religious freedom. It is these things that have a noble and proud history in England.

St George’s Day should be about all those who defied the powers that be for democracy and freedom: Levellers, Chartists, suffragettes; those who fought for democracy, those who campaigned against slavery, and for human rights; for the rights of minorities and immigrants. This is the true meaning of St George’s Day.

My call for rebranding St George's Day has made it into the Bolton News here.

I shall post the video of my reflection on St George here next week.

Update: My efforts have been blogged about what by Jonathan Bartley here. The ideas I've been banding about have all come from an Ekklesia paper here.

Update: here's the video

Comments

Andrew Bethune said…
As a Scot living for a few years in England, I'm always pleased to see the St George flag flying. It makes a huge change from seeing the Union flag everywhere.

It may not be obvious to many people, but unfortunately a lot of people in England seem to confuse the concepts of England and Britain. The BBC, the London newspapers, try hard to be politically correct, and use the term 'British', but they so often get it wrong.

The media talk about 'the nation' meaning Britain, but actually Britain is a collection of several nations - Scotland, England, Wales, a bit of ireland and (possibly) Cornwall.

Likewise, many people don't realise, England doesn't have its own parliament - it has to make do with the uncomfortable fudge of Westminster, which has to serve as both the parliament for England and the parliament of the UK as a whole.

Yes, England needs to recover its own identity, and that includes the celebration of St George's Day.
8:39 pm
Anonymous said…
England is a nation of regions as well. Yorkshire people, Scouse people etc all have distinct identities.
3:41 pm
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The dumbest thing about American Unitarian Univeralism

I'm glad Peacebang started blogging about this cos I was about to, and now it's like I'm joining in with a conversation rather than doing a big rant and having a go at Americans (though that is always fun ;-)). Why the hell do American (or is it just in New England??) UU churches take, like a quarter of the year off? In the summer they close. They CLOSE!! A church, closing. It's so bloody weird and wrong. Where does it come from? Why? Why? Why? Why do people need church less in the summer? Where are people supposed to go? Where is the Divine supposed to go? My church in Boston didn't close exactly, but moved to the smaller upstairs chapel, but the minister still had all that time off. Now I've spent most of my life around teachers and priests, both jobs where people think people don't put many hours in, when in fact they put in loads ('you only work Sunday mornings/9 to 3.25'). Teachers work hard and need their long holidays. Ministers work hard, a...
4 comments
Read more

Is humanism theologically tolerant?

OK, well this might be controversial, but I feel the need to say it. Is humanist tolerant? Please note I'm not asking about humanism within society. Clearly humanism certainly believes in tolerance within society and I'm forever glad they are often the only people in the media calling for a separation of church and state. No, what I'm talking about is descriptions of Unitarianism like this and adverts like this , discussed at Peacebang here , which say that humanism is one option, Christianity is another, God is one option among many. The trouble is, humanism, by definition is theologically opposed to theism. This is very different from the relationship between Christianity and Buddhism. These two traditions may be vastly different, but Buddhism, by definition , is not opposed to Christianity, and Christianity, by definition , is not opposed to Buddhism. But humanism is consciously defined in opposition to Christianity and theism. So to say that humanism and theism can bot...
14 comments
Read more

LOST and theology: who are the good guys?

***Spoiler alert*** I'm continuing some theological/philosophical reflections while re-watching the series LOST. One of the recurring themes in LOST is the idea of the "good guys" and the "bad guys." We start the series assuming the survivors (who are the main characters) are the "good guys" and the mysterious "Others" are definitely bad guys. But at the end of series 2 one of the main characters asks the Others, "Who are  you people?" and they answer, in an extremely disturbing way, "We're the good guys." The series develops with a number of different factions appearing, "the people from the freighter" "the DHARMA initiative" as well as divisions among the original survivors. The question remains among all these complicated happenings "who really are the good guys?" I think one of the most significant lines in the series is an episode when Hurley is having a conversation with ...
3 comments
Read more