Skip to main content

Hate Crime

I admit that I don't really get news from very traditional sources - usually things like Ekklesia, the Daily Show, Radio 1, and sometimes Radio 4. But how the hell did I miss that a gay man was attacked and killed in Trafalgar Square in central London in a homophobic attack? Have I just been watching the Simpsons rather than the 6 o' clock news and missed it or has this been under-reported?

It was only when I was looking at the new Lesbian and Gay Chrisrian Movement website that I heard about this.

There's a vigil happening in London, almost as I type this. So I'll virtually stand in solitaridy against hate crimes.

Comments

home staging said…
To be honest I will never understand, how sick the person has to be to conceive the idea of killing a human being just because of a homosexual orientation. How is it anyone's business, when someone likes people of the same sex? I think those people are seriously hung up and perhaps not very well educated, if they are capable of doing such a condemnable act. Ella
Anonymous said…
As you used the words 'hate crime, would you like to react to the article at :-http://www.christian.org.uk/news/c4-news-calls-pauline-howes-letter-a-crime/

this concerns the murder you mention and another incident - do you consider both to be 'hate crimes' and what is your definition of the phrase you use ?
Annoymous,

I assume there's a legal definition of a "hate crime" and I'm not an expert to give that definition, but I assume it involves violence against people or property motivated by hatred towards a particular group of people.

I interpreted the Channel 4 piece to be contrasting murder with a letter as very different things that have been investigated by the police as hate crimes. But I suppose it could have been misleading.

I don't know the details of this letter, but as a liberal I certainly agree that it should not be a crime to express an opinion unless that is inciting violence or murder.
Yewtree said…
It was on Pink News.

Unfortunately there is a rise in homophobic hate crime at the moment, it appears.

How it could happen in Trafalgar Square, which one would assume is well lit and frequented by a lot of people, seems bizarre.

It is horrific.
max said…
Hate crimes that are towards the mere fact of being a homosexual are horrific. These people just have different opinions and liking of the same sex. I will never understand why people take so much offense and effort to "eliminate" these people, both being humans. They don't "bother" anyone just because they've fallen in love with the same gender. These hate crimes are absolutely ridiculous and hopefully one day this world will realize that we're all just people who relate to each other more than we know, and need to get over this fact of being "different" because of your sexuality.

Popular posts from this blog

Radical?

When I started this blog nearly 4 years and nearly 300 posts ago one of the labels I used for it/me was "radical." Perhaps I used it a little unreflectively. Recently I've been pondering what radical means. A couple of things have made me think of this. Firstly this blog series from my friend Jeremy, which explores a distinction between "radical progressives" and "rational progressives." There is also this definition of radical, liberal and conservative from Terry Eagleton quoted at Young Anabaptist Radicals : “Radicals are those who believe that things are extremely bad with us, but they could feasibly be much improved. Conservatives believe that things are pretty bad, but that’s just the way the human animal is. And liberals believe that there’s a little bit of good and bad in all of us.” What interests me is finding a way to express the tension I feel sometimes between myself and the wider Unitarian movement. One way to express this is to say I tend

What does it mean to be non-creedal?

Steve Caldwell says "The problem here isn't humanism vs. theism for theist Unitarian Universalists -- it's the non-creedal nature of Unitarian Universalism" This is a good point. We need to think much more deeply about what it means to be a non-creedal religion. The first thing I want to say is that there is more than one possible understanding of non-creedalism. The Disciples of Christ are a non-creedal church, they say here : " Freedom of belief. Disciples are called together around one essential of faith: belief in Jesus Christ as Lord and Savior. Persons are free to follow their consciences guided by the Bible, the Holy Spirit study and prayer, and are expected to extend that freedom to others." Quakers are also non-creedal and say here : Quakers have no set creed or dogma - that means we do not have any declared statements which you have to believe to be a Quaker. There are, however, some commonly held views which unite us. One accepted view is that th

What is Radical Christianity?

Radical Christianity is about encountering the God of love . It is first and foremost rooted in the discovery of a universal and unconditional source of love at the heart of reality and within each person. God is the name we give to this source of love. It is possible to have a direct and real personal encounter with this God through spiritual practice. We encounter God, and are nourished by God, through the regular practice of prayer, or contemplation.  Radical Christianity is about following a man called Jesus . It is rooted in the teaching of Jesus of Nazareth, a Jewish prophet living under occupation of the Roman Empire two thousand years ago. It understands that's Jesus' message was the message of liberation. His message was that when we truly encounter God, and let God's love flow through us, we begin to be liberated from the powers of empire and violence and encounter the  "realm of God" - an alternative spiritual and social reality rooted in love rather th