Skip to main content

What is Unitarianism? Video

For those of you who don't know me personally and wonder what I look and sound like: here I am:



Well done to the DUWIT folks for getting us some good videos on YouTube at last.

Comments

Paul Oakley said…
Thanks for posting this, Stephen! I had run across the group of Youtube videos in this series just the day before your post. Your post inspired me to post some of them, including yours, on my blog, together with a humorous piece and a couple of UU spots:

http://innerlight-radiantlife.blogspot.com/2009/05/yuutube.html

Blessings,
Paul
2:26 am
Anonymous said…
I'm not sure that these clips do much for the contributors nor for the denomination.A visual medium requires more visual material and less text - watch any good documentary for evidence of this.Much more to the point would be for churches to post audios of their services'/sermons - Dublin does quite frequently ; apart from 'being on You tube, these clips don't work for me - I'm sorry to say the same goes for David Usher's pieces - couldn't he have been video'd in an interesting chapel ?
4:25 pm
Tim (S Manc) said…
I'm not sure what you're getting at, Anon. You say that visual contributions need less text, but you then go on to recommend audio downloads of sermons.

The videos were made on a budget of zero. I think they serve as useful soundbites and they communicate sincere testimony about why the participants are Unitarian. The sincerity is the key, and I think that's all that matters to anyone who is trying to find out more on Unitarianism and searches the word on Google and YouTube.

For an example of the opposite kind of religious film: check out this latest offering from the Mormons. It's slick, but incredibly cynical; it tries so hard to be subtle that the propaganda jumps right out at you.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n4peVdpf9kE
9:50 pm
Anonymous said…
It was striking how Christian these videos sounded - despite being a denomination that for years has tried to paint itself as something 'more than Christian'.....
11:58 am
Stephen Lingwood said…
That is an interesting observation Anonymous. I think it's interesting to note the difference between someone saying something on behalf of all Unitarians and trying to be "inclusive" (as David Usher is doing) and people speaking only on their own behalf (as the other speakers in this series do). I've always thought it's much better to have a variety of different voices rather than one voice trying to speak for everyone.

When people do speak for themselves they are able to go deeper rather than broad and engage in a "language of reverence." I hope the amount of "Christian" talk in this videos represents a movement coming to a kind of spiritual maturity, no longer running away from the depths of religious realities, and comfortable with its roots.
3:00 pm
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What does it mean to be non-creedal?

Steve Caldwell says "The problem here isn't humanism vs. theism for theist Unitarian Universalists -- it's the non-creedal nature of Unitarian Universalism" This is a good point. We need to think much more deeply about what it means to be a non-creedal religion. The first thing I want to say is that there is more than one possible understanding of non-creedalism. The Disciples of Christ are a non-creedal church, they say here : " Freedom of belief. Disciples are called together around one essential of faith: belief in Jesus Christ as Lord and Savior. Persons are free to follow their consciences guided by the Bible, the Holy Spirit study and prayer, and are expected to extend that freedom to others." Quakers are also non-creedal and say here : Quakers have no set creed or dogma - that means we do not have any declared statements which you have to believe to be a Quaker. There are, however, some commonly held views which unite us. One accepted view is that th...
3 comments
Read more

LOST and theology: who are the good guys?

***Spoiler alert*** I'm continuing some theological/philosophical reflections while re-watching the series LOST. One of the recurring themes in LOST is the idea of the "good guys" and the "bad guys." We start the series assuming the survivors (who are the main characters) are the "good guys" and the mysterious "Others" are definitely bad guys. But at the end of series 2 one of the main characters asks the Others, "Who are  you people?" and they answer, in an extremely disturbing way, "We're the good guys." The series develops with a number of different factions appearing, "the people from the freighter" "the DHARMA initiative" as well as divisions among the original survivors. The question remains among all these complicated happenings "who really are the good guys?" I think one of the most significant lines in the series is an episode when Hurley is having a conversation with ...
3 comments
Read more

Is humanism theologically tolerant?

OK, well this might be controversial, but I feel the need to say it. Is humanist tolerant? Please note I'm not asking about humanism within society. Clearly humanism certainly believes in tolerance within society and I'm forever glad they are often the only people in the media calling for a separation of church and state. No, what I'm talking about is descriptions of Unitarianism like this and adverts like this , discussed at Peacebang here , which say that humanism is one option, Christianity is another, God is one option among many. The trouble is, humanism, by definition is theologically opposed to theism. This is very different from the relationship between Christianity and Buddhism. These two traditions may be vastly different, but Buddhism, by definition , is not opposed to Christianity, and Christianity, by definition , is not opposed to Buddhism. But humanism is consciously defined in opposition to Christianity and theism. So to say that humanism and theism can bot...
14 comments
Read more