Skip to main content

Sufi Retreat



So... a few unsytematic reflections on my first Sufi retreat.

I love the fact that in one tradition there is a place for silence, for liturgical prayer and for dancing and singing with a guitar. Usually I have to go to different communities to get all those.

I didn't like how programmed the retreat was. I would have liked more spare time to get more reading done and reflection.

For the first time in my life I was worshipping in a non-Christian, non-Unitarian community. I needed to do that. If only for some perspective.

I think my spirituality might be more visual than auditory. I'm not sure chanting words over and over again suits me.

There were some lovely people there, though not a great deal of diversity.

It was absolutely beautiful all week, I was sunbathing while other parts of the country drowned.

I starved myself of Jesus, intentionally, more about that later.

There was lots I was critical of, I don't know why that should suprise me. It's the same in any mainline Christian service. I'm a critical rationalist trying to be a mystic. They're not mutually exclusive. But I want concepts explained to me.

There were times when I winced when it all seemed a bit New Age in the worst sense of that kind of thing.

Where is social justice in this sort of thing? If I did reach the heights of mystical achievement what difference would that make to the world?

I am a Unitarian. It sort of suprises me when I come back to that conclusion. I give myself every opportunity to come to a different conclusion, but it never happens. It is good to test the path.

Comments

Anonymous said…
Stephen wrote: I'm a critical rationalist trying to be a mystic. They're not mutually exclusive. But I want concepts explained to me.

There were times when I winced when it all seemed a bit New Age in the worst sense of that kind of thing.


I suspect I'd've felt the same if I'd been there.

I also suspect that, like me, Stephen has had the benefit of having his ability to "think straight" affirmed by (at least soe of) those close to him as he grew up with the result that he is comfortable with it.

Not everyone has had that good fortune, and those who have not may indeed prefer not to have concepts explained to them, fearing for the ability to connect spiritually if they have to confront that part of their incompleteness.

One of the tougher choices we may have to make, as a denomination, in devising our growth strategy, is whether to pitch our appeal to such people, or to the likes of Stephen and I.

Popular posts from this blog

Swords into Ploughshares

  "They shall beat their swords into ploughshares, and their spears into pruning hooks; nation shall not lift up sword against nation, neither shall they learn war any more." Isaiah 2:4 Palestine Action are doing just this: beating swords into ploughshares i.e. putting weapons out of use. In doing so they are fulfilling this biblical mandate. They are expressing God's peace as expressed in the Jewish tradition and the Christian tradition. God desires that our swords shall be beaten into ploughshares, that we should unlearn war. That the government wants to make this action illegal has to be confronted in the strongest terms. To rush to condemn attacks on weapons but not attacks on children is perverse. To call attacks on weapons terrorism but not attacks on children is perverse. When government comes to such an extreme position - legislating that peace is war, that weapons need more protection than children - then they have fundamentally gone wrong. This is the definitio...

Is humanism theologically tolerant?

OK, well this might be controversial, but I feel the need to say it. Is humanist tolerant? Please note I'm not asking about humanism within society. Clearly humanism certainly believes in tolerance within society and I'm forever glad they are often the only people in the media calling for a separation of church and state. No, what I'm talking about is descriptions of Unitarianism like this and adverts like this , discussed at Peacebang here , which say that humanism is one option, Christianity is another, God is one option among many. The trouble is, humanism, by definition is theologically opposed to theism. This is very different from the relationship between Christianity and Buddhism. These two traditions may be vastly different, but Buddhism, by definition , is not opposed to Christianity, and Christianity, by definition , is not opposed to Buddhism. But humanism is consciously defined in opposition to Christianity and theism. So to say that humanism and theism can bot...

Clergy-wear during protests

OK, I'm wandering into the territory of Beauty Tips for Ministers here, but a couple of recent conversations have brought up the issue of what clergy should wear for protests. I know a number of Ministers who only wear clerical collars for protests. The logic is that it's important to identify as a Minister when you're supporting something society doesn't expect clergy to. So Ministers will wear a collar at gay prides or pro-choice rallies to make this point. Now I could understand this if it you wore a collar going about your general business, and also did during a protest, but I'm quite uncomfortable with the idea of wearing clerical wear ONLY for protests. The seems to be something worth exploring. I have said before that I'm not in favour of special titles or clothing for religious leadership, mainly because Jesus explicitly said this was a lot of nonsense. Religious leaders should not need these articial crutches. I have no problem with certain liturgical c...