Skip to main content

The shocking truth #2

Here's another shocking truth for Unitarians:

People don't have a problem with 'God' - people have a problem with 'church.'

If two thirds or more of the British population consider themselves Christian, but less than 20% go to church, what is that telling us? It is telling us most Britons don't dislike 'God' or 'Jesus' - though they may not have orthodox intepretations of what they are. But I think most people are deeply distrustful of 'church.' I think people are distrustful of institutions that they see as wielding power (bishops in the House of Lords) hierarchical (bishops in general) and interested in lining their own pockets and keeping people in their place.

In short people are interested in a church-less God, and Unitarianism is offering a God-less church.

Our message, then, should not be 'you don't have to believe in God to come here' - but 'we do church differently.' What needs redeeming is not people's understanding of God as much as people's understanding of church.


Rich said…
Now, you see, I'm on the other end of that spectrum. I became a Unitarian because I am a "you don't have to believe in God" kind of person. But you're right, something about churches does disturb me but it hasn't been fully extinguished with my transition from C of E to Unitarianism.

I think in the end it comes down to money. I know my church needs money to survive, and I know that possession of land and claiming interest on mortgages and so forth is a perfectly honest way of making money, but I would prefer it was carried out more in the open. We have our annual general meetings and annual reports and so on, but this is only like a publicly-traded company. Couldn't we be more Unitarian about it and maybe have some leaflets or even sermons on the subject of "how do Unitarian churches make money, and why do they have to do it this way?"
Stephen - I have to say, you are blogging maestro, addressing really relevant issues and providing folks like me in the USA a really great perspcetive on what is happening with UK Unitarians. I just wanted to say THANKS. Keep it up brother!
Anonymous said…
Unitarianism is in the doldrums and trys to be everything to everyone and gets little accomplished in the process.

Popular posts from this blog

From liberalism to radicalism

I've been reflecting recently on the journey I've been making from liberalism to radicalism, and how I'm beginning to see it as a necessary evolution if you're not going to get stuck in a kind of immature liberalism that fails to serve both you and the world. By liberalism I mean ideas and movements that emphasise personal freedom and not being restricted by the patterns of the past. By radicalism I mean ideas and movements that emphasise justice, solidarity, and liberation from oppression. Yes, I'm using broad categories here. Let me give an example. Let's talk about sexual liberation in a Western context for example. We can talk about women getting more agency over their bodies; gay and bi people being able to have sex with one another and marry one another; we can talk about the work of overcoming shame around sexuality. All of that is liberalism. It's good stuff. It's still ongoing. So we might ask the question "where next for sexu

Am I an activist?

  I remember being at some protest outside the Senedd once, and someone introduced me to someone else, and said, "Stephen is an activist." I remember thinking - am I? I don't know. What does it mean to be an activist? Who gets to use that title? Am I an activist because I turn up at a few protests? Or do I have to be one them organising the protest to be an activist? Do I have to lead? Do I have to do the organisational work to be an activist? Because the truth is that since I moved to Cardiff I have kept myself at the periphery of a lot of activist groups. I go to meetings, I hear about things, I turn up at protests, but I have rarely got really fully involved. Why is that? It's not for the reason that I don't have time. I do, in fact. But often I sit in these meetings and protests and think "Is this effective? Is it worthwhile? Is it going to produce something at the end of it all that is worth the effort?" I suppose, coming from the world of church I

LOST and theology: who are the good guys?

***Spoiler alert*** I'm continuing some theological/philosophical reflections while re-watching the series LOST. One of the recurring themes in LOST is the idea of the "good guys" and the "bad guys." We start the series assuming the survivors (who are the main characters) are the "good guys" and the mysterious "Others" are definitely bad guys. But at the end of series 2 one of the main characters asks the Others, "Who are  you people?" and they answer, in an extremely disturbing way, "We're the good guys." The series develops with a number of different factions appearing, "the people from the freighter" "the DHARMA initiative" as well as divisions among the original survivors. The question remains among all these complicated happenings "who really are the good guys?" I think one of the most significant lines in the series is an episode when Hurley is having a conversation with