Skip to main content

Why I don't do Pride Month

 

(Image from Aloyisius, wikipedia)

I'm still very suspicious of the idea of "Pride Month." Intuitively it makes very little sense to me. Pride is a protest, an event when I march through my city (over the years it's been Birmingham, Boston, Manchester, Bolton, Cardiff) and stand up for the rights of LGBT+ people, and for liberation from all forms of oppression. You can't have rights for LGBT+ asylum seekers unless there's immigration justice. LGBT+ people are more likely to suffer homelessness and poverty, and so LGBT+ liberation requires economic justice. A protest is not a season. Liberation doesn't have a season. It either happens on one particular day or it's for every day.
"Pride Month" is a commercial capitalist season. It is the way of marking time that suits institutions and corporations. Like secular Christmas, or barbeque season, or pumpkin latte season, it's there to put up a new display and sell a new product. It's there to take our natural tendency to mark time, and exploit it so our instincts of anticipation, enjoyment, and reflection become associated with the buying and consuming of product.
It's a way for corporation and institutions to do lip service towards a cause to the extent that it serves the institution, rather than the institution in any sense acting sacrificially for a greater cause. It's painting itself in rainbows rather than putting it's money into where there are needs and putting bodies onto the street.
I'm not interested in "Happy Pride Month." Trans people are under attack right now like never before. It's not happy. We're in danger and unless you're actively opposing the EHRC, actively opposing the Supreme Court, actively opposing Wes Streeting, you have no claim right now to say you're celebrating or supporting LGBT+ folks. If you're not standing up for us then you're just exploiting us.
It's not a happy Pride Month. It's a get on the streets and fight for existence and freedom and flourishing month. Like it is every month. Yes there will be Pride parades, yes there will be protests, yes we will be visible and angry and thankful for Marsha P Johnson and all the prophets and foreparents who threw bricks and marched and put their bodies on the line. And yes we will party and dance, and put on our finery and be fabulous, because damn it we're alive and that's because our ancestors fought to make it so, and yes we're not miserable and that's because our ancestors fought to make it so.
I will march and I will party and I will mourn and I will celebrate when it's Pride in my city. But I'm not doing Pride Month.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Drop the Free Christian!

Let me preface what I'm going to say by first saying this: I am a Christian. It's taken me a long time to be able to say that, and to know what I mean by that, and I'm very lucky that in the Unitarian church I have been given the space to come to that decision in my own time, on my own terms. But I am a Christian, I'm more Christian now than I have been for years. Now: I want us to drop this "Free Christian" from our title. It's a silly phrase that we need to get rid of. Why? "The General Assembly of Unitarian and Free Christian Churches" is a long and unwieldy title. It would be much better if we traded under something like "Unitarians in Britain." It gives the impression that there are two separate and distinct groups: "Unitarians" and "Free Christians," this is not the case. It's not that there are Unitarians (who are not Christians) and "Free Christians" who are not Unitarians. There are not two dif...
21 comments
Read more

Clergy-wear during protests

OK, I'm wandering into the territory of Beauty Tips for Ministers here, but a couple of recent conversations have brought up the issue of what clergy should wear for protests. I know a number of Ministers who only wear clerical collars for protests. The logic is that it's important to identify as a Minister when you're supporting something society doesn't expect clergy to. So Ministers will wear a collar at gay prides or pro-choice rallies to make this point. Now I could understand this if it you wore a collar going about your general business, and also did during a protest, but I'm quite uncomfortable with the idea of wearing clerical wear ONLY for protests. The seems to be something worth exploring. I have said before that I'm not in favour of special titles or clothing for religious leadership, mainly because Jesus explicitly said this was a lot of nonsense. Religious leaders should not need these articial crutches. I have no problem with certain liturgical c...
11 comments
Read more

Is humanism theologically tolerant?

OK, well this might be controversial, but I feel the need to say it. Is humanist tolerant? Please note I'm not asking about humanism within society. Clearly humanism certainly believes in tolerance within society and I'm forever glad they are often the only people in the media calling for a separation of church and state. No, what I'm talking about is descriptions of Unitarianism like this and adverts like this , discussed at Peacebang here , which say that humanism is one option, Christianity is another, God is one option among many. The trouble is, humanism, by definition is theologically opposed to theism. This is very different from the relationship between Christianity and Buddhism. These two traditions may be vastly different, but Buddhism, by definition , is not opposed to Christianity, and Christianity, by definition , is not opposed to Buddhism. But humanism is consciously defined in opposition to Christianity and theism. So to say that humanism and theism can bot...
14 comments
Read more