Skip to main content

Growth: 5 new churches a year?

Ron Robinson over at Planting God Communities has recently pointed his readers towards older posts that are worth rereading. In one, about growth, he quotes Lyle Scaller who says:

"The single best approach for any religious body seeking to reach, attract, serve, and assimilte younger generations and newcomers in the community is to launch three new missions annually for every one hundred congregations in that organization. A significant fringe benefit of this policy is that it usually will reduce the resources for continuing subsidies to institutions that will be healthier if they are forced to become financially self-supporting."

This, for British Unitarianism, would mean about 5 new churches a year. Assuming a 'mission' is the same as a 'church' (broadly, broadly defined). I wonder if anything like this kind of a conversation will happen at the 'growth-orientated' Annual Meetings coming up. OK, let's be really pessimistic and say 1 new congregation a year. We're probably losing congregations at about that rate anyway. Is that crazily impossible or very possible and wise?

But maybe our 'religious body' doesn't run in the same way that Schaller imagines. How much does the General Assembly subsidies our churches? Not very much. Perhaps the appropriate 'religious body' in our context would be the district. Some districts do actively subsidies member churches. Perhaps the district is the appropriate body to launch new church plants? After all districts like Merseyside and Lancashire are actually called 'Missions.' Perhaps they need to be.


Robin Edgar said…
Maybe Unitarians need to define just what their mission is before creating any new "missions". . .
I would be stoked to see more intentional organizing of new congregations. The UUA has gone through a lot of different strategies, and they are extremely expensive.

I have always seem Young Adult and Campus Ministry organizing a very affordable and high return strategy. In the years I was staffing the work, we connected with over 10,000 young adults, provided them spiritual growth, leadership opportunities, information, organizing tools, and so forth. So many are involved in our churches now, although no hard statistics are available. Still, we've put the ministry on the map for the UUA in a way that it hasn't been before.

While we may not start 30 new congregations each year, 30 new YACM groups would be wildly popular I think.
Robin, yes, you're right, it is important to get a sense of mission and vision out of which we do mission, though I think if we try to get the perfect 'mission statment' correct first then we'd never get started.

Good to hear from you Joseph. Yeah, I think it's a good idea to see young adult groups as misssions that increase the health of the larger movement. We're still working to put that ministry on the map over here!

Popular posts from this blog

From liberalism to radicalism

I've been reflecting recently on the journey I've been making from liberalism to radicalism, and how I'm beginning to see it as a necessary evolution if you're not going to get stuck in a kind of immature liberalism that fails to serve both you and the world. By liberalism I mean ideas and movements that emphasise personal freedom and not being restricted by the patterns of the past. By radicalism I mean ideas and movements that emphasise justice, solidarity, and liberation from oppression. Yes, I'm using broad categories here. Let me give an example. Let's talk about sexual liberation in a Western context for example. We can talk about women getting more agency over their bodies; gay and bi people being able to have sex with one another and marry one another; we can talk about the work of overcoming shame around sexuality. All of that is liberalism. It's good stuff. It's still ongoing. So we might ask the question "where next for sexu

Am I an activist?

  I remember being at some protest outside the Senedd once, and someone introduced me to someone else, and said, "Stephen is an activist." I remember thinking - am I? I don't know. What does it mean to be an activist? Who gets to use that title? Am I an activist because I turn up at a few protests? Or do I have to be one them organising the protest to be an activist? Do I have to lead? Do I have to do the organisational work to be an activist? Because the truth is that since I moved to Cardiff I have kept myself at the periphery of a lot of activist groups. I go to meetings, I hear about things, I turn up at protests, but I have rarely got really fully involved. Why is that? It's not for the reason that I don't have time. I do, in fact. But often I sit in these meetings and protests and think "Is this effective? Is it worthwhile? Is it going to produce something at the end of it all that is worth the effort?" I suppose, coming from the world of church I

LOST and theology: who are the good guys?

***Spoiler alert*** I'm continuing some theological/philosophical reflections while re-watching the series LOST. One of the recurring themes in LOST is the idea of the "good guys" and the "bad guys." We start the series assuming the survivors (who are the main characters) are the "good guys" and the mysterious "Others" are definitely bad guys. But at the end of series 2 one of the main characters asks the Others, "Who are  you people?" and they answer, in an extremely disturbing way, "We're the good guys." The series develops with a number of different factions appearing, "the people from the freighter" "the DHARMA initiative" as well as divisions among the original survivors. The question remains among all these complicated happenings "who really are the good guys?" I think one of the most significant lines in the series is an episode when Hurley is having a conversation with