Achievements of 2007, aims for 2008

Last year I wrote that my aims for 2007 were to get a relationship, to learn to drive, and to get spiritual director.

To update you: I am in a relationship now, I am learning to drive, and I still haven't got spiritual director.

So for 2008 I need to:

Pass my driving test.
Get a spiritual director.
And get a job, like being a proper minister and thing.

Comments

Robin Edgar said…

So just what are your chances of finding a suitable "spiritual director" within the British Unitarian community?

3:53 pm

Stephen Lingwood said…

Not very likely at all, Robin. Spiritual direction is something that isn't really part of our faith life right now. I hope that changes in the future.

I have deleted your comment from the other post because it was off-topic.

6:38 pm

Robin Edgar said…

Well it was very much on the general topic of YouTube videos about people who are discriminated against due to their religious beliefs and practices. . . Are you limiting the topic of that thread only to discrimination against Muslims? Can I possibly slip it in here as being on topic to the current *spiritual direction* (or lack thereof. . .) of Montreal Unitarian U*Us.

Happy New Year anyway Stephen. It looks like it's off to a rip roaring start for that bane and scourge of the whole-wide U*U World the dreaded Emerson Avenger. . . Come to think of it, it is now being insinuated by at least one Montreal Unitarian U*U that I am something of a terrorist. ;-)

Needless to say I am not the least bit surprised to hear your candid response that spiritual direction is not really part of British Unitarian faith life right now.

11:41 pm

Robin Edgar said…

Thanks for being a good sport Stephen. I will try to look you up the next time I am in the UK which will hopefully be within the next year or two.

11:49 pm

Swords into Ploughshares

"They shall beat their swords into ploughshares, and their spears into pruning hooks; nation shall not lift up sword against nation, neither shall they learn war any more." Isaiah 2:4 Palestine Action are doing just this: beating swords into ploughshares i.e. putting weapons out of use. In doing so they are fulfilling this biblical mandate. They are expressing God's peace as expressed in the Jewish tradition and the Christian tradition. God desires that our swords shall be beaten into ploughshares, that we should unlearn war. That the government wants to make this action illegal has to be confronted in the strongest terms. To rush to condemn attacks on weapons but not attacks on children is perverse. To call attacks on weapons terrorism but not attacks on children is perverse. When government comes to such an extreme position - legislating that peace is war, that weapons need more protection than children - then they have fundamentally gone wrong. This is the definitio...

Is humanism theologically tolerant?

OK, well this might be controversial, but I feel the need to say it. Is humanist tolerant? Please note I'm not asking about humanism within society. Clearly humanism certainly believes in tolerance within society and I'm forever glad they are often the only people in the media calling for a separation of church and state. No, what I'm talking about is descriptions of Unitarianism like this and adverts like this , discussed at Peacebang here , which say that humanism is one option, Christianity is another, God is one option among many. The trouble is, humanism, by definition is theologically opposed to theism. This is very different from the relationship between Christianity and Buddhism. These two traditions may be vastly different, but Buddhism, by definition , is not opposed to Christianity, and Christianity, by definition , is not opposed to Buddhism. But humanism is consciously defined in opposition to Christianity and theism. So to say that humanism and theism can bot...

Clergy-wear during protests

OK, I'm wandering into the territory of Beauty Tips for Ministers here, but a couple of recent conversations have brought up the issue of what clergy should wear for protests. I know a number of Ministers who only wear clerical collars for protests. The logic is that it's important to identify as a Minister when you're supporting something society doesn't expect clergy to. So Ministers will wear a collar at gay prides or pro-choice rallies to make this point. Now I could understand this if it you wore a collar going about your general business, and also did during a protest, but I'm quite uncomfortable with the idea of wearing clerical wear ONLY for protests. The seems to be something worth exploring. I have said before that I'm not in favour of special titles or clothing for religious leadership, mainly because Jesus explicitly said this was a lot of nonsense. Religious leaders should not need these articial crutches. I have no problem with certain liturgical c...

Reignite

Search This Blog