Skip to main content

Israel-Palestine

I'm thinking of preaching about Israel-Palestine during Advent.

My consciousness was raised about this at Greenbelt this year, but I still don't know much about it. Anyone know of any resources to inform me on this issue? What should local religious communities know about this issue? And what should they be doing?

Comments

DairyStateDad said…
Might I suggest this site as a starting point? My sister, a Quaker in suburban Philadelphia, Pa., has worked with them and traveled to Israel/Palestine with them. I'm not sure what kind of presence/resources they have in the UK.

http://www.compassionatelistening.org/
7:19 pm
Yewtree said…
Wow, Stephen. If you can get your head round it, I say go for it. It's an issue I have always struggled with. I could probably outline what I think the issues are and what the causes of the current situation are, but I have no idea what the solution is.

I do like the way the Northern Ireland situation has been defused by reconciliation, and the use of the Truth and Reconciliation process in South Africa, and wonder if something like that could be tried in Israel / Palestine.
1:46 pm
Stephen Lingwood said…
I think we're a long way from truth and reconciliation in Israel-Palestine. That would have to be down the road, especially if there was a one state solution, but you can't talk about reconciliation when the powerful are still actively oppressing the powerless.
2:32 pm
Joseph said…
If religious communities the world over wish to help resolve the middle east impasse, they should first stay out of politics. The best thing to do is to assist the work of those Israelis and Palestinians who daily work at coexistence. For example:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_lc2FjXXYog&feature=related

There is a surprising amount of coexistence in Israel/Palestine that is more than often ignored by people wishing to make political points or see the situation in simplistic (Israel is evil, Palestinians are innocent victims) terms.

There are some serious issues to be resolved and the situation is far, far from being resolved, but a solution can and eventually will be found by the people on the ground, that will bring peace to that most beautiful and holy land.
8:18 am
Tim Moore said…
Israel-Palestine is a very complex and multi-facetted conflict. It has a long history and involves a whole region. It is an ethnic, territorial, religious and political conflict.

I want justice for dispossessed and oppressed Palestinians and I want Israel's right-wing Likud-led government called to account. I also want the constant threats made to Israel acknowledged and the oppression by other Palestinians and Arabs on Palestinians challenged.

I don't get this position from the highly selective and one-sided narrative presented to Christians in the UK by organisations like Christian Aid and Bible Lands. The representation is of Palestinians = poor, Israelis = trigger happy. I read little about the corruption of the Palestinian Authority, nothing about secular Israel's equal rights for women and toleration of LGBT people, and nothing about Hamas or its persecution of Christians, other than that Hamas was "created" by Israel. It's not to say there is no truth to Christian Aid's or Bible Lands' position, but without a lot more background and nuance, it's a narrative I won't subscribe to and one I find dangerous.

I too would advise against taking a certain side, as I think it better serves the Unitarian spirit to acknowledge that different opinions are valid, even serving the values of peace and justice. You may also find strong views on either side, which may end up being divisive.

There's information from the Council for Christians and Jews, Liberal Judaism and the Center for Jewish Arab Economic Co-operation. Joint projects by Israeli trade unions (the congress is called Histadrut) which might be worth looking into. Might also be worth speaking to Jane Barraclough if you haven't done already: Jane offered a different and refreshing analysis of the conflict in a recent sermon.
7:07 pm
Stephen Lingwood said…
Joseph: firstly it is impossible for religion to "stay out of politics" - if religion has anything to do with ethics, it has something to do with politics. And to remain aloof from the issues of the day is a political stance, in and of itself.

This is the kind of issue when my liberal side is in tension with my liberationist side. Just because there are two sides to an argument does not mean that both sides are equally valid. All moral issues are ambiguous and complex. Stuff we think is obvious now (like slavery) were not clear-cut at the time. I'm reading the Journal of John Woolman at the moment and he's always agonising over the way to express his views, and recognising the different views other people have. Things are always messy, but I don't think that's an excuse not to make a stand.

But surely it is possible to simply come down on the rule of law? Terrorism, and the indiscriminate killing of civilians is against international law, and immoral, and so are Israeli settlements and the systematic oppression of the Palestinians. Can the international community (all of us) be agreed on that? At the minimum can we call upon all sides to obey the law?

Am I being naive? Simplistic? Ignorant?

The thing is I don't want my (our) ignorance to prevent me (us) from engaging with one of the most pressing issues of our time.
5:06 pm
Joseph said…
Stephen,
Please do not misunderstand me, I certainly do not advocate aloofness from that tragic conflict. When I said that it would be better for religious groups to stay out of politics I meant party politics. One has to try and understand the views of Israelis and Palestinians whether they support Likud or Labour, Fatah or Hamas. I feel that in Britain the conflict is viewed in simplistic Left-Right terms. The Left frequently display a pathological hatred of Israel over and above any other nation, and frequently distort or reinvent history to further their view. The Right often use Israel as their vicarious warrior in their own personal "war" against Islamism (and even Islam). This will not bring progress, but only compound the misery.

International Law is not as simple as many presume. I have heard many convincing arguments in favour of the legality of the settlements (I am opposed to them). In addition I do not view the UN as a particularly authoritative legal arbiter, considering that the majority of its members fail to observe even basic legal necessities. I would much prefer if our country simply held to account as much as possible both sides when they violate what we as a nation regard as basic human and legal rights.

I honestly feel that the best help we can offer is to assist those Jews and Arabs in the Holy Land, who are actively working to build strong bonds of coexistence between these two noble peoples.
12:03 am
Stephen Lingwood said…
I found the Ecumenical Accompaniment Programme in Palestine and Israel to be a good resource.

www.eappi.org
5:44 pm
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What does it mean to be non-creedal?

Steve Caldwell says "The problem here isn't humanism vs. theism for theist Unitarian Universalists -- it's the non-creedal nature of Unitarian Universalism" This is a good point. We need to think much more deeply about what it means to be a non-creedal religion. The first thing I want to say is that there is more than one possible understanding of non-creedalism. The Disciples of Christ are a non-creedal church, they say here : " Freedom of belief. Disciples are called together around one essential of faith: belief in Jesus Christ as Lord and Savior. Persons are free to follow their consciences guided by the Bible, the Holy Spirit study and prayer, and are expected to extend that freedom to others." Quakers are also non-creedal and say here : Quakers have no set creed or dogma - that means we do not have any declared statements which you have to believe to be a Quaker. There are, however, some commonly held views which unite us. One accepted view is that th...
3 comments
Read more

LOST and theology: who are the good guys?

***Spoiler alert*** I'm continuing some theological/philosophical reflections while re-watching the series LOST. One of the recurring themes in LOST is the idea of the "good guys" and the "bad guys." We start the series assuming the survivors (who are the main characters) are the "good guys" and the mysterious "Others" are definitely bad guys. But at the end of series 2 one of the main characters asks the Others, "Who are  you people?" and they answer, in an extremely disturbing way, "We're the good guys." The series develops with a number of different factions appearing, "the people from the freighter" "the DHARMA initiative" as well as divisions among the original survivors. The question remains among all these complicated happenings "who really are the good guys?" I think one of the most significant lines in the series is an episode when Hurley is having a conversation with ...
3 comments
Read more

What is Radical Christianity?

Radical Christianity is about encountering the God of love . It is first and foremost rooted in the discovery of a universal and unconditional source of love at the heart of reality and within each person. God is the name we give to this source of love. It is possible to have a direct and real personal encounter with this God through spiritual practice. We encounter God, and are nourished by God, through the regular practice of prayer, or contemplation.  Radical Christianity is about following a man called Jesus . It is rooted in the teaching of Jesus of Nazareth, a Jewish prophet living under occupation of the Roman Empire two thousand years ago. It understands that's Jesus' message was the message of liberation. His message was that when we truly encounter God, and let God's love flow through us, we begin to be liberated from the powers of empire and violence and encounter the  "realm of God" - an alternative spiritual and social reality rooted in love rather th...
Post a Comment
Read more