Skip to main content

GA: Day Two

Last night I didn't leave the Zette Office til past 3am. Zettes need folding and stuff. Wow it's like being in Press Gang, 'cept less of the early nineties-ness.


Business Meeting
Got up about 9 and went in late to the first business meeting. I got there in time for the controversial bit. They wanted to change the minimum amount to pay someone for covering a one off service from £32 for lay people and £35 for ministers to £40 for everyone. Nearly all of the ministers complained about this, saying that it this was like saying that any lay person was as qualified as a minister to take a service, which wasn't taking into account all the training that ministers do.

This wasn't about money. I could understand where ministers were coming from. We should appreciate ministers and all the work they do, and we often don't. But at the same time I couldn't help think of the Parable of the Workers in the Vinyard (Matthew 20:1 - 16). If it's fair to pay a minister £40, then that's fair. Does it take away if £40 is also paid to lay preachers? In the end, we're talking about a few pounds in any case.

Interfaith Panel

A lot of people talking about local interfaith work. Good good.

Foy Society: BUYAN

We spoke about the trip to Opus 2005 and our creation of BUYAN.

Earth Spirit Network

Worship service based on the Green Man. It was OK, and I really liked the guided meditation that Tony McNeile did. I just wished we could have been outside, with the grass under our feet and between our fingers and the sun in our eyes and the cool air in our lungs. Isn't that the point of Earth-centred spirituality?

Unitarian Christian Association

In some ways this was not that impressive, as it was just a couple of guys talking without enough time to get into anything in depth. But at the same time I was really impressed in some ways. The UCA has completely changed its constitution and they made the point again and again that they are not a political group engaged in making the community 'more Christian' but a place that can be a resource for Unitarians who want to explore the Christian tradition. Andrew Brown, who is increasingly going to be an important theologian in this community, talked about the need to develop strong liberal Christian theology. I must have a chat with him.

Unitarian Women's Group

I actually meant to go to a worship but walked into the wrong room and ended up going to this. But it was pretty good. They had a speaker from Womankind Worldwide.

Unitarian Lesbian and Gay Group

No inclusion for bisexuals or trans folk yet. They talked about Civil Partnerships, with one couple that done it. I made the point that we should be agitating for full same-sex marriage and seemed to get a consensus so that might become a motion next year. Yay!

Hibbert Trust

Not that interesting, but important. That's money for you. It's a good fund, and if I do academic work in the future I might try get some money from them. We did use cool voting technology with hand-held devices. Like 'Who Wants To Be A Millionaire'!! Cool!

Young Adult Worship

And now for something completely different. Us young 'uns teaching this community how different worship can be. Tree praying and spiral dancing. Pictures came out really well!

Comments

Anonymous said…
"they made the point again and again that they are not a political group engaged in making the community 'more Christian'"

Why do you think they had to keep making this point?
Anonymous said…
I attended that session as well. To my mind, they sounded very defensive...might one even say paranoid? One must ask why?
Anonymous said…
villification by the bastions of tolerance and freedom

Popular posts from this blog

What does it mean to be non-creedal?

Steve Caldwell says "The problem here isn't humanism vs. theism for theist Unitarian Universalists -- it's the non-creedal nature of Unitarian Universalism" This is a good point. We need to think much more deeply about what it means to be a non-creedal religion. The first thing I want to say is that there is more than one possible understanding of non-creedalism. The Disciples of Christ are a non-creedal church, they say here : " Freedom of belief. Disciples are called together around one essential of faith: belief in Jesus Christ as Lord and Savior. Persons are free to follow their consciences guided by the Bible, the Holy Spirit study and prayer, and are expected to extend that freedom to others." Quakers are also non-creedal and say here : Quakers have no set creed or dogma - that means we do not have any declared statements which you have to believe to be a Quaker. There are, however, some commonly held views which unite us. One accepted view is that th...

LOST and theology: who are the good guys?

***Spoiler alert*** I'm continuing some theological/philosophical reflections while re-watching the series LOST. One of the recurring themes in LOST is the idea of the "good guys" and the "bad guys." We start the series assuming the survivors (who are the main characters) are the "good guys" and the mysterious "Others" are definitely bad guys. But at the end of series 2 one of the main characters asks the Others, "Who are  you people?" and they answer, in an extremely disturbing way, "We're the good guys." The series develops with a number of different factions appearing, "the people from the freighter" "the DHARMA initiative" as well as divisions among the original survivors. The question remains among all these complicated happenings "who really are the good guys?" I think one of the most significant lines in the series is an episode when Hurley is having a conversation with ...

Is humanism theologically tolerant?

OK, well this might be controversial, but I feel the need to say it. Is humanist tolerant? Please note I'm not asking about humanism within society. Clearly humanism certainly believes in tolerance within society and I'm forever glad they are often the only people in the media calling for a separation of church and state. No, what I'm talking about is descriptions of Unitarianism like this and adverts like this , discussed at Peacebang here , which say that humanism is one option, Christianity is another, God is one option among many. The trouble is, humanism, by definition is theologically opposed to theism. This is very different from the relationship between Christianity and Buddhism. These two traditions may be vastly different, but Buddhism, by definition , is not opposed to Christianity, and Christianity, by definition , is not opposed to Buddhism. But humanism is consciously defined in opposition to Christianity and theism. So to say that humanism and theism can bot...