Skip to main content

Why I don't do Pride Month

 

(Image from Aloyisius, wikipedia)

I'm still very suspicious of the idea of "Pride Month." Intuitively it makes very little sense to me. Pride is a protest, an event when I march through my city (over the years it's been Birmingham, Boston, Manchester, Bolton, Cardiff) and stand up for the rights of LGBT+ people, and for liberation from all forms of oppression. You can't have rights for LGBT+ asylum seekers unless there's immigration justice. LGBT+ people are more likely to suffer homelessness and poverty, and so LGBT+ liberation requires economic justice. A protest is not a season. Liberation doesn't have a season. It either happens on one particular day or it's for every day.
"Pride Month" is a commercial capitalist season. It is the way of marking time that suits institutions and corporations. Like secular Christmas, or barbeque season, or pumpkin latte season, it's there to put up a new display and sell a new product. It's there to take our natural tendency to mark time, and exploit it so our instincts of anticipation, enjoyment, and reflection become associated with the buying and consuming of product.
It's a way for corporation and institutions to do lip service towards a cause to the extent that it serves the institution, rather than the institution in any sense acting sacrificially for a greater cause. It's painting itself in rainbows rather than putting it's money into where there are needs and putting bodies onto the street.
I'm not interested in "Happy Pride Month." Trans people are under attack right now like never before. It's not happy. We're in danger and unless you're actively opposing the EHRC, actively opposing the Supreme Court, actively opposing Wes Streeting, you have no claim right now to say you're celebrating or supporting LGBT+ folks. If you're not standing up for us then you're just exploiting us.
It's not a happy Pride Month. It's a get on the streets and fight for existence and freedom and flourishing month. Like it is every month. Yes there will be Pride parades, yes there will be protests, yes we will be visible and angry and thankful for Marsha P Johnson and all the prophets and foreparents who threw bricks and marched and put their bodies on the line. And yes we will party and dance, and put on our finery and be fabulous, because damn it we're alive and that's because our ancestors fought to make it so, and yes we're not miserable and that's because our ancestors fought to make it so.
I will march and I will party and I will mourn and I will celebrate when it's Pride in my city. But I'm not doing Pride Month.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The dumbest thing about American Unitarian Univeralism

I'm glad Peacebang started blogging about this cos I was about to, and now it's like I'm joining in with a conversation rather than doing a big rant and having a go at Americans (though that is always fun ;-)). Why the hell do American (or is it just in New England??) UU churches take, like a quarter of the year off? In the summer they close. They CLOSE!! A church, closing. It's so bloody weird and wrong. Where does it come from? Why? Why? Why? Why do people need church less in the summer? Where are people supposed to go? Where is the Divine supposed to go? My church in Boston didn't close exactly, but moved to the smaller upstairs chapel, but the minister still had all that time off. Now I've spent most of my life around teachers and priests, both jobs where people think people don't put many hours in, when in fact they put in loads ('you only work Sunday mornings/9 to 3.25'). Teachers work hard and need their long holidays. Ministers work hard, a...
4 comments
Read more

Is humanism theologically tolerant?

OK, well this might be controversial, but I feel the need to say it. Is humanist tolerant? Please note I'm not asking about humanism within society. Clearly humanism certainly believes in tolerance within society and I'm forever glad they are often the only people in the media calling for a separation of church and state. No, what I'm talking about is descriptions of Unitarianism like this and adverts like this , discussed at Peacebang here , which say that humanism is one option, Christianity is another, God is one option among many. The trouble is, humanism, by definition is theologically opposed to theism. This is very different from the relationship between Christianity and Buddhism. These two traditions may be vastly different, but Buddhism, by definition , is not opposed to Christianity, and Christianity, by definition , is not opposed to Buddhism. But humanism is consciously defined in opposition to Christianity and theism. So to say that humanism and theism can bot...
14 comments
Read more

LOST and theology: who are the good guys?

***Spoiler alert*** I'm continuing some theological/philosophical reflections while re-watching the series LOST. One of the recurring themes in LOST is the idea of the "good guys" and the "bad guys." We start the series assuming the survivors (who are the main characters) are the "good guys" and the mysterious "Others" are definitely bad guys. But at the end of series 2 one of the main characters asks the Others, "Who are  you people?" and they answer, in an extremely disturbing way, "We're the good guys." The series develops with a number of different factions appearing, "the people from the freighter" "the DHARMA initiative" as well as divisions among the original survivors. The question remains among all these complicated happenings "who really are the good guys?" I think one of the most significant lines in the series is an episode when Hurley is having a conversation with ...
3 comments
Read more