Skip to main content

Christians for a Republic

It was a Saturday morning in May. In the middle of a conversation in rainy Trafalgar Square I raised my finger to try to politely indicate to the person I was talking to that I was going to join the Lord's Prayer that I just realised was starting through the loud speakers. My conversation partner paused for a moment, and I closed my eyes and joined in with the congregation in Westminster Abbey in an act of Christian prayer, "Our Father, who art in heaven..."

It was the only time I felt some kind of connection to what was happening there at the coronation service a mile away, a nominally Christian service that I was protesting against, carrying a hand-written sign reading "Christians for a Republic."

The whole thing was rather incongruent. I could half hear the music and cadences of an Anglican cathedral service, while in a crowd almost continuously chanting "Not my king! Not my king!" and (my personal favourite) "He's just a normal man! He's just a normal man!". As a Christian, part of my gut instinct was to join in with the service, and I did enjoy parts of it (I rather like "Praise My Soul, the King of Heaven"). But equally as a Christian I felt it my duty to be at the republican protest. I wanted to to be there, and I very explicitly wanted to be there as a Christian, to witness Christian values, and to follow the Way of Christ. 

My republicanism is inseparable from my Christianity. I am a republican because I am a Christian. I believe in the supreme value of all people equally as children of God. I believe the good news of Jesus is good news for the poor. And I believe that God alone can be worshipped. Monarchy to me amounts to worshipping and bowing down to a human being in an act of idolatry. And as I and others kept chanting, Charles Windsor is "just a normal man." When I got home and watched the service that I had only half-heard previously there was one phrase that stood out for me. At one point Justin Welby said the phrase "the true profession of the gospel". Well for me, the true profession of the gospel is equality. It is justice for the poor and the demand that the rich give up their wealth and privilege. 

That service for me did not feel like the true profession of the gospel of love and justice. It felt like a celebration of inequality, privilege, power, and wealth - values totally contrary to the message of Jesus. And I knew that anyone watching would get the impression that Christianity was something aligned with royalty, establishment, wealth, and privilege. As would all those people at the republican protest. And as a minimum I wanted to give an alternative view, the view that some Christians believe very deeply in democracy and equality and that some form of elected head of state in the United Kingdom would reflect those values better. I was delighted to discover I wasn't the only Christian there protesting. I met up with some others in the crowd and we effectively founded Christians for a Republic. True, right now this is just a facebook page, but it could be more. 

I freely admit that this cause is not the most important one. We have to deal with the climate crisis and poverty and lots of other things. The first thing on the list is not getting rid of the monarchy. But that doesn't mean that we should all passively support the monarchy. Many of us don't want this system and should be unafraid to say so. It is of course, partly symbolic. The monarchy is the symbol and inequality and privilege and helps give legitimacy to a whole bigger system of inequality. But what became clear that weekend is that it's also a symbol of authoritarianism and the violence of the increasingly fascist police state in the UK. The fact that the police arrested the organisers of the republican protest before it even started is a serious attack on human rights that should worry all of us. Charles Windsor has said nothing condemning those arrests so we must conclude from his silence that he approves of people being arrested for expressing an opinion. He sits at the apex of a rotten system giving legitimacy to all of it.

I do hope that Charles Windsor does learn the good news of Jesus that he is theoretically committed to. But that does require conversion. It requires listening to Jesus when he said to another rich person, lovingly, "Sell what you have, give it to the poor, and then come follow me."

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Radical?

When I started this blog nearly 4 years and nearly 300 posts ago one of the labels I used for it/me was "radical." Perhaps I used it a little unreflectively. Recently I've been pondering what radical means. A couple of things have made me think of this. Firstly this blog series from my friend Jeremy, which explores a distinction between "radical progressives" and "rational progressives." There is also this definition of radical, liberal and conservative from Terry Eagleton quoted at Young Anabaptist Radicals : “Radicals are those who believe that things are extremely bad with us, but they could feasibly be much improved. Conservatives believe that things are pretty bad, but that’s just the way the human animal is. And liberals believe that there’s a little bit of good and bad in all of us.” What interests me is finding a way to express the tension I feel sometimes between myself and the wider Unitarian movement. One way to express this is to say I tend

What does it mean to be non-creedal?

Steve Caldwell says "The problem here isn't humanism vs. theism for theist Unitarian Universalists -- it's the non-creedal nature of Unitarian Universalism" This is a good point. We need to think much more deeply about what it means to be a non-creedal religion. The first thing I want to say is that there is more than one possible understanding of non-creedalism. The Disciples of Christ are a non-creedal church, they say here : " Freedom of belief. Disciples are called together around one essential of faith: belief in Jesus Christ as Lord and Savior. Persons are free to follow their consciences guided by the Bible, the Holy Spirit study and prayer, and are expected to extend that freedom to others." Quakers are also non-creedal and say here : Quakers have no set creed or dogma - that means we do not have any declared statements which you have to believe to be a Quaker. There are, however, some commonly held views which unite us. One accepted view is that th

What is Radical Christianity?

Radical Christianity is about encountering the God of love . It is first and foremost rooted in the discovery of a universal and unconditional source of love at the heart of reality and within each person. God is the name we give to this source of love. It is possible to have a direct and real personal encounter with this God through spiritual practice. We encounter God, and are nourished by God, through the regular practice of prayer, or contemplation.  Radical Christianity is about following a man called Jesus . It is rooted in the teaching of Jesus of Nazareth, a Jewish prophet living under occupation of the Roman Empire two thousand years ago. It understands that's Jesus' message was the message of liberation. His message was that when we truly encounter God, and let God's love flow through us, we begin to be liberated from the powers of empire and violence and encounter the  "realm of God" - an alternative spiritual and social reality rooted in love rather th