Skip to main content

What is Radical Christianity?


Radical Christianity is about encountering the God of love
. It is first and foremost rooted in the discovery of a universal and unconditional source of love at the heart of reality and within each person. God is the name we give to this source of love. It is possible to have a direct and real personal encounter with this God through spiritual practice. We encounter God, and are nourished by God, through the regular practice of prayer, or contemplation. 

Radical Christianity is about following a man called Jesus. It is rooted in the teaching of Jesus of Nazareth, a Jewish prophet living under occupation of the Roman Empire two thousand years ago. It understands that's Jesus' message was the message of liberation. His message was that when we truly encounter God, and let God's love flow through us, we begin to be liberated from the powers of empire and violence and encounter the  "realm of God" - an alternative spiritual and social reality rooted in love rather than power, and compassion rather than violence.

Radical Christianity is liberating. It understands that the practice of Christian faith is the practice of liberation. It understands that Christian spiritual practice liberates us personally - from anxiety, hatred, and greed; and liberates our society - from harmful economic systems, from poverty, from racism, sexism, homophobia, classism and all forms of oppression. It understands that Christians have not always worked towards this liberation, and at times have actively worked against it. Radical Christians repent of when Christianity has not been on the side of justice, and continue to commit to make amends and to practice a justice-centred faith. 

Radical Christianity is evolving. It understands that God is beyond our language, that finding truth is hard, that faith is mysterious, that we do not have all the answers, and need to keep reforming, learning, and listening to others. It is rooted in a tradition going back to Jewish prophets of thousands of years ago but is constantly trying to learn from science and culture, use the thinking mind, listen to personal conscience, and discern truth in dialogue with others.

Radical Christianity works with others. We accept the fact of religious and cultural diversity and seek to build coalitions with people of all faiths and none in the work of liberation. We embrace the reality of Christians as a minority in society and do not wish to impose our faith on others through coercion. We condemn Christian supremacy as a form of oppression and violence. 


These words are my own attempt at expressing the nature of Radical Christianity, but they draw on historic and contemporary traditions and communities including:

The Anabaptist Mennonite Network

The Center for Prophetic Imagination

Contemplative Outreach

Enfleshed

The General Assembly of Unitarian and Free Christian Churches

The Religious Society of Friends (Quakers)

The Progressive Christianity Network

The Unitarian Christian Association

The Universalist Church of America

as well as various traditions of Liberation Theology.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The dumbest thing about American Unitarian Univeralism

I'm glad Peacebang started blogging about this cos I was about to, and now it's like I'm joining in with a conversation rather than doing a big rant and having a go at Americans (though that is always fun ;-)). Why the hell do American (or is it just in New England??) UU churches take, like a quarter of the year off? In the summer they close. They CLOSE!! A church, closing. It's so bloody weird and wrong. Where does it come from? Why? Why? Why? Why do people need church less in the summer? Where are people supposed to go? Where is the Divine supposed to go? My church in Boston didn't close exactly, but moved to the smaller upstairs chapel, but the minister still had all that time off. Now I've spent most of my life around teachers and priests, both jobs where people think people don't put many hours in, when in fact they put in loads ('you only work Sunday mornings/9 to 3.25'). Teachers work hard and need their long holidays. Ministers work hard, a...

Is humanism theologically tolerant?

OK, well this might be controversial, but I feel the need to say it. Is humanist tolerant? Please note I'm not asking about humanism within society. Clearly humanism certainly believes in tolerance within society and I'm forever glad they are often the only people in the media calling for a separation of church and state. No, what I'm talking about is descriptions of Unitarianism like this and adverts like this , discussed at Peacebang here , which say that humanism is one option, Christianity is another, God is one option among many. The trouble is, humanism, by definition is theologically opposed to theism. This is very different from the relationship between Christianity and Buddhism. These two traditions may be vastly different, but Buddhism, by definition , is not opposed to Christianity, and Christianity, by definition , is not opposed to Buddhism. But humanism is consciously defined in opposition to Christianity and theism. So to say that humanism and theism can bot...

LOST and theology: who are the good guys?

***Spoiler alert*** I'm continuing some theological/philosophical reflections while re-watching the series LOST. One of the recurring themes in LOST is the idea of the "good guys" and the "bad guys." We start the series assuming the survivors (who are the main characters) are the "good guys" and the mysterious "Others" are definitely bad guys. But at the end of series 2 one of the main characters asks the Others, "Who are  you people?" and they answer, in an extremely disturbing way, "We're the good guys." The series develops with a number of different factions appearing, "the people from the freighter" "the DHARMA initiative" as well as divisions among the original survivors. The question remains among all these complicated happenings "who really are the good guys?" I think one of the most significant lines in the series is an episode when Hurley is having a conversation with ...