Skip to main content

Unitarian General Assembly Annual Meetings 2012

So the Annual Meetings have ended today. First I need to say that I wasn't there the whole time. Frankly it was very inconvenient and annoying that the meetings were in the week before Easter. We have a Maundy Thursday communion and this year we hosted the ecumenical Good Friday service (today), so there was no way I could be there the whole time. Frankly if I didn't have an official role in the being Chair of Ministry Strategy Group I wouldn't have gone at all. As it was I was there from Monday to Wednesday.

So Tim Moore (starting here) has got a lot more detail than I have this year. Since I've got back Twitter has also been a good place to keep in touch: #GAUK.

The meetings started, as always, with the John Relly Beard Lecture this year by Peter-Owen Jones off of the telly.


A lot of people seemed to like what he was saying, but to be honest to me it was a bit of preaching to the choir. It was the kind of talk I would hear at Greenbelt, a basically liberal religious message. It may just be where I am at the moment but I find it boring now, I'm not really interested in "ideas" about how to be religious, I want something more practical about actually how to live my life.

The only other thing I can really report on is the Business Meetings. I was only present at one motion: a rather illiberal motion calling for non-military national service. Even though an amendment changed it to "non-compulsary" the motion was still defeated. The issue of young people, social alienation and unemployment is a big one. But I think we need to think a lot more about the issue and do more before we rush to solutions like national service. Today apparently a similar motion calling for compulsary voting was also defeated.

One motion on the right to die was, apparently after a respectful debate, referred back. This seems like a very wise thing to do. We can spend some more quality time thinking about this issue rather than rushing to make a decision.

Most significantly, I think, we also passed the motion calling for full marriage equality. Perhaps this was the motion that should have been passed in 2008 rather than "civil partnerships in religious buildings" but now is a good time for us to take a stand while the government consultation is still happening.

Other highlights included the opening celebrations (including banner parade) with a rock band, favourite comment on Twitter about this: '"Sweet home Alabama" being played by 6th form rock band at close of opening celebrations. Not sure why- but who cares?!?'

Overall there was some disquiet expressed by the direction in which the Executive are going (or at least the way they're doing it). Having that debate is fine, but I still think we're doing it without a recognition that we're in a critical time. We're getting closer but overall there is still not enough urgency. The next ten years will be absolutely critical in determining whether Unitarianism survives, we're still not acting like this is the case.

What helps is this is the first GA, in my memory, when membership numbers have been discussed. The Executive have aimed for 20% growth in five years (starting last year) and as I've noted we have declined 3% in the last year. Frankly the 20% growth will not happen. No where near will it happen. If membership numbers stay the same and grow 0% that will be a significant achievement. You have to run very fast to stay still. The only way we could produce 20% growth would be if we were launching five new congregations a year (or at least one new congregation a year). Until that happens we will keep declining.

Luckily that is on the cards, with a project called 2020 Congregational Development. I wasn't there for any official reporting on this, but I'm very excited about it. It is the best news to come out of the GA. I'll be interested to see how that develops.

Comments

Tim Moore said…
Thanks for adding the link to my blog, Stephen. I found your blogging from past Annual Meetings very informative, so I hoped others would find it useful if I did the same. Remember, you had the idea first!

Popular posts from this blog

Radical?

When I started this blog nearly 4 years and nearly 300 posts ago one of the labels I used for it/me was "radical." Perhaps I used it a little unreflectively. Recently I've been pondering what radical means. A couple of things have made me think of this. Firstly this blog series from my friend Jeremy, which explores a distinction between "radical progressives" and "rational progressives." There is also this definition of radical, liberal and conservative from Terry Eagleton quoted at Young Anabaptist Radicals : “Radicals are those who believe that things are extremely bad with us, but they could feasibly be much improved. Conservatives believe that things are pretty bad, but that’s just the way the human animal is. And liberals believe that there’s a little bit of good and bad in all of us.” What interests me is finding a way to express the tension I feel sometimes between myself and the wider Unitarian movement. One way to express this is to say I tend

What does it mean to be non-creedal?

Steve Caldwell says "The problem here isn't humanism vs. theism for theist Unitarian Universalists -- it's the non-creedal nature of Unitarian Universalism" This is a good point. We need to think much more deeply about what it means to be a non-creedal religion. The first thing I want to say is that there is more than one possible understanding of non-creedalism. The Disciples of Christ are a non-creedal church, they say here : " Freedom of belief. Disciples are called together around one essential of faith: belief in Jesus Christ as Lord and Savior. Persons are free to follow their consciences guided by the Bible, the Holy Spirit study and prayer, and are expected to extend that freedom to others." Quakers are also non-creedal and say here : Quakers have no set creed or dogma - that means we do not have any declared statements which you have to believe to be a Quaker. There are, however, some commonly held views which unite us. One accepted view is that th

What is Radical Christianity?

Radical Christianity is about encountering the God of love . It is first and foremost rooted in the discovery of a universal and unconditional source of love at the heart of reality and within each person. God is the name we give to this source of love. It is possible to have a direct and real personal encounter with this God through spiritual practice. We encounter God, and are nourished by God, through the regular practice of prayer, or contemplation.  Radical Christianity is about following a man called Jesus . It is rooted in the teaching of Jesus of Nazareth, a Jewish prophet living under occupation of the Roman Empire two thousand years ago. It understands that's Jesus' message was the message of liberation. His message was that when we truly encounter God, and let God's love flow through us, we begin to be liberated from the powers of empire and violence and encounter the  "realm of God" - an alternative spiritual and social reality rooted in love rather th