Skip to main content

Management vs Leadership

"Management is a set of processes that can keep a complicated system of people and technology running smoothly. The most important aspects of management include planning, budgeting, organising, staffing, controlling, and problem solving.

Leadership is a set of processes that creates organisations in the first place or adapts them to significantly changing circumstances. Leadership defines what the future should look like, aligns people with that vision, and inspires them to make it happen despite the obstacles."

John Kotter



The problem with British Unitarianism, locally and nationally, is that we do management rather than leadership.

Comments

Robertson said…
Stephen writes:-
"The problem with British Unitarianism, locally and nationally, is that we do management rather than leadership."It has been so for a long time - at least 30 years in my experience - now it has become the management of decline in all but a few significant places.I think that the same applies to the Methodists and the URC - the latter now smaller than either of the two constituent churches that formed it in the sixties.Unitarianism with its emphasis upon private judgement in matters of faith and its diversity of belief - it's not so much non-credal as multi-credal- is too nuanced to appeal beyond a relatively sophisticated and well educated minority and many of those would find little sustenance in many of our churches.
Few of us are gifted at leadership - I am not for example. Sadly, it's true to say that I have been more inspired by the vision of a good CEO at work, than I have by any Unitarian.

Our structure does not naturally lend itself to leadership. Independence is highly valued, and everyone has a different opinion. It's hard for leadership to flourish.

OTOH it would be a mistake to underestimate the importance of management and dismiss it as bean counting of one description or another.
Angela,

I'm less convinced today that leadership is about "gifts" (innate). I'm more inclined today to think that leadership is about "skills" which can be learnt by most people.
Sorry, yes,leadership skills can be learned. But, I've noticed that some people can naturally lead a crowd and others can't and need to lean on their position/reputation.

You would need a lot of reputation or natural talent to lead Unitarians. It's a tough crowd.

Popular posts from this blog

The dumbest thing about American Unitarian Univeralism

I'm glad Peacebang started blogging about this cos I was about to, and now it's like I'm joining in with a conversation rather than doing a big rant and having a go at Americans (though that is always fun ;-)). Why the hell do American (or is it just in New England??) UU churches take, like a quarter of the year off? In the summer they close. They CLOSE!! A church, closing. It's so bloody weird and wrong. Where does it come from? Why? Why? Why? Why do people need church less in the summer? Where are people supposed to go? Where is the Divine supposed to go? My church in Boston didn't close exactly, but moved to the smaller upstairs chapel, but the minister still had all that time off. Now I've spent most of my life around teachers and priests, both jobs where people think people don't put many hours in, when in fact they put in loads ('you only work Sunday mornings/9 to 3.25'). Teachers work hard and need their long holidays. Ministers work hard, a...

Is humanism theologically tolerant?

OK, well this might be controversial, but I feel the need to say it. Is humanist tolerant? Please note I'm not asking about humanism within society. Clearly humanism certainly believes in tolerance within society and I'm forever glad they are often the only people in the media calling for a separation of church and state. No, what I'm talking about is descriptions of Unitarianism like this and adverts like this , discussed at Peacebang here , which say that humanism is one option, Christianity is another, God is one option among many. The trouble is, humanism, by definition is theologically opposed to theism. This is very different from the relationship between Christianity and Buddhism. These two traditions may be vastly different, but Buddhism, by definition , is not opposed to Christianity, and Christianity, by definition , is not opposed to Buddhism. But humanism is consciously defined in opposition to Christianity and theism. So to say that humanism and theism can bot...

LOST and theology: who are the good guys?

***Spoiler alert*** I'm continuing some theological/philosophical reflections while re-watching the series LOST. One of the recurring themes in LOST is the idea of the "good guys" and the "bad guys." We start the series assuming the survivors (who are the main characters) are the "good guys" and the mysterious "Others" are definitely bad guys. But at the end of series 2 one of the main characters asks the Others, "Who are  you people?" and they answer, in an extremely disturbing way, "We're the good guys." The series develops with a number of different factions appearing, "the people from the freighter" "the DHARMA initiative" as well as divisions among the original survivors. The question remains among all these complicated happenings "who really are the good guys?" I think one of the most significant lines in the series is an episode when Hurley is having a conversation with ...