Skip to main content

New Chief Officer

Just reporting. Significantly it's on the GA website before I've posted, which is different from last time when I reported before it got on the official website.

Well done, Derek.

STATEMENT BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF UNITARIAN AND FREE CHRISTIAN CHURCHES

The Executive Committee is pleased to announce that Derek McAuley has been
appointed to the post of Chief Officer of the General Assembly of Unitarian and
Free Christian Churches. It is anticipated that he will take up the position in
December 2009.


Derek, aged 50, has been active within the Unitarian movement at
congregational, district and national levels and has been a member of the
Executive Committee since April 2008 and General Assembly Treasurer since April
2009. He served as a member of the Hibbert Trust collaborative inquiry into the
future of liberal religion: “Shaping the Future”.


He has been a senior manager in the National Health Service for 17 years in
Merseyside and Manchester and also brings long experience as a voluntary sector
trustee and chair.


Derek said;

”I am excited to be offered this opportunity to serve the Unitarian
denomination in a new way and look forward to working closely with current
staff at Essex Hall, members of the Executive Committee and Unitarians across
Great Britain and Ireland.

I want to play my part in developing the movement across the spectrum of its
activities and for Unitarianism to grow both numerically but also as a group of
communities sharing common values of liberal religion.

I have benefited immensely from my association with Unitarianism and I want to
see others share that experience. I have a lot to learn but am looking forward
to starting work as soon as I can at Unitarian Headquarters.”



Executive Committee Convenor, Sir Peter Soulsby said;

“The Executive Committee are delighted to be able to appoint Derek to the
post of Chief Officer. He brings a wealth of experience in leadership and
management from both outside and within the Movement. His commitment and
experience will be a tremendous asset and we look forward to working closely
with him to take forward an agenda of change.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What does it mean to be non-creedal?

Steve Caldwell says "The problem here isn't humanism vs. theism for theist Unitarian Universalists -- it's the non-creedal nature of Unitarian Universalism" This is a good point. We need to think much more deeply about what it means to be a non-creedal religion. The first thing I want to say is that there is more than one possible understanding of non-creedalism. The Disciples of Christ are a non-creedal church, they say here : " Freedom of belief. Disciples are called together around one essential of faith: belief in Jesus Christ as Lord and Savior. Persons are free to follow their consciences guided by the Bible, the Holy Spirit study and prayer, and are expected to extend that freedom to others." Quakers are also non-creedal and say here : Quakers have no set creed or dogma - that means we do not have any declared statements which you have to believe to be a Quaker. There are, however, some commonly held views which unite us. One accepted view is that th...
3 comments
Read more

LOST and theology: who are the good guys?

***Spoiler alert*** I'm continuing some theological/philosophical reflections while re-watching the series LOST. One of the recurring themes in LOST is the idea of the "good guys" and the "bad guys." We start the series assuming the survivors (who are the main characters) are the "good guys" and the mysterious "Others" are definitely bad guys. But at the end of series 2 one of the main characters asks the Others, "Who are  you people?" and they answer, in an extremely disturbing way, "We're the good guys." The series develops with a number of different factions appearing, "the people from the freighter" "the DHARMA initiative" as well as divisions among the original survivors. The question remains among all these complicated happenings "who really are the good guys?" I think one of the most significant lines in the series is an episode when Hurley is having a conversation with ...
3 comments
Read more

Is humanism theologically tolerant?

OK, well this might be controversial, but I feel the need to say it. Is humanist tolerant? Please note I'm not asking about humanism within society. Clearly humanism certainly believes in tolerance within society and I'm forever glad they are often the only people in the media calling for a separation of church and state. No, what I'm talking about is descriptions of Unitarianism like this and adverts like this , discussed at Peacebang here , which say that humanism is one option, Christianity is another, God is one option among many. The trouble is, humanism, by definition is theologically opposed to theism. This is very different from the relationship between Christianity and Buddhism. These two traditions may be vastly different, but Buddhism, by definition , is not opposed to Christianity, and Christianity, by definition , is not opposed to Buddhism. But humanism is consciously defined in opposition to Christianity and theism. So to say that humanism and theism can bot...
14 comments
Read more