Skip to main content

The Changing Landscape of Faith in Britain

A few months ago a report came out about people changing faith in Britain. It provides an important insight into how and why people are leaving or joining faith communities. It feels important to me to see this complex picture. There's a lot of talk about "young people are doing this or that" and I'm always sceptical of such generalisations. Certainly there are trends. Christianity is dropping as an overall trend but within that there are thousands of people who are joining and leaving faith communities and faith positions all the time. Many different things can be true at once. 

The report is here. It involved surveying 2774 adults who had self-identified as changing their faith position. And there's plenty to chew on in it.

Here is my summary of what I think is interesting.


The primary reason for people becoming Christian in modern Britain are:

  1. Personal connection with God
  2. A sense of purpose
  3. A sense of community.

Life events associated with becoming Christian

  1. Nothing in particular
  2. Bereavement 
  3. Mental health pressures

The results of becoming Christian:

  1. A renewed sense of purpose
  2. More positive outlook
  3. Improvements in mental wellbeing

Reasons for leaving Christianity:

  1. Lack of belief in God
  2. Doubts about doctrine
  3. Clashes with personal values


Primary reasons for people becoming Muslim in modern Britain:

  1. A sense of purpose
  2. Not applicable (maybe marriage?)
  3. A personal connection to God

Life events associated with becoming Muslim:

  1. Nothing in particular
  2. Global events such as war
  3. Mental health

Results of becoming Muslim:

  1. A greater sense of purpose
  2. A more positive outlook
  3. Making better sense of the world

Reasons for leaving Islam:

  1. Disagreement with doctrine
  2. Intellectual disagreement
  3. Clashes with personal moral values


Reasons for people joining Dharmic religions (mainly Buddhism)

  1. A sense of purpose
  2. Personal transformation and healing
  3. Community

Results of joining a Dharmic faith:

  1. Better emotional health
  2. Positive outlook
  3. Renewed sense of purpose 

(Life events not reported)

(Reasons for leaving not reported)


Reasons for people becoming "spiritual" (including pagan) in modern Britain:

  1. A sense of purpose
  2. Emotional healing
  3. Personal connection

Life events connected with becoming "spiritual":

  1. Nothing in particular
  2. Mental health
  3. Bereavement

Results of becoming "spiritual":

  1. A sense of purpose
  2. Emotional healing
  3. Personal connection


Reasons for becoming atheist in modern Britain:

  1. Lack of belief in God
  2. Conflict with doctrines
  3. Intellectual disagreement with religious claims

Results of becoming atheist:

  1. None
  2. Making better sense of the world
  3. Feeling emotionally healthier


So, according to this survey, the main reasons people religiously convert in modern Britain are:

  1. A sense of meaning and moral clarity (strongest among the "spiritual" and Dharmic/Buddhist)
  2. Desire for personal transformation and healing (strongest among the "spiritual" and Dharmic/Buddhist)
  3. A personal connection with the divine (strongest among Christians)

Bereavement is the most common life event associated with conversion but for many there was no particular life event, suggesting conversion as a gradual process.

Converts generally experience a greater sense of purpose, emotional health, and positive outlook.


In many ways all of this is kind of obvious. Nothing is that surprising. And yet it suggests to me that the things that matter most are in some ways the things we pay least attention to in the church world: the theological, spiritual, and psychological. In a Christian context conservatives might say the most important thing is that the church is relevant in form/style. Liberals say the church needs to be adapted to science and not be homophobic as the most important thing. Both are (kinda) wrong.

The reason people join a church is because they encounter/believe in God. And the primary reason people leave a church is because they stop believing in God. Kinda obvious but often unaddressed as the central issue. 

So to gain converts a religion should:

  • Provide a strong sense of purpose
  • Provide a positive outlook on the world
  • Provide a sense of emotional healing and wellbeing
  • Provide a pathway of personal connection to God
  • Provide sense-making in the face of global injustice (Islam seems to do this most)
Of course this is just one study and the there are all kinds of nuances we could draw out. The world is complicated but this kind of evidence-based study is important if you want to think about these things and act on them well. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Drop the Free Christian!

Let me preface what I'm going to say by first saying this: I am a Christian. It's taken me a long time to be able to say that, and to know what I mean by that, and I'm very lucky that in the Unitarian church I have been given the space to come to that decision in my own time, on my own terms. But I am a Christian, I'm more Christian now than I have been for years. Now: I want us to drop this "Free Christian" from our title. It's a silly phrase that we need to get rid of. Why? "The General Assembly of Unitarian and Free Christian Churches" is a long and unwieldy title. It would be much better if we traded under something like "Unitarians in Britain." It gives the impression that there are two separate and distinct groups: "Unitarians" and "Free Christians," this is not the case. It's not that there are Unitarians (who are not Christians) and "Free Christians" who are not Unitarians. There are not two dif...

Clergy-wear during protests

OK, I'm wandering into the territory of Beauty Tips for Ministers here, but a couple of recent conversations have brought up the issue of what clergy should wear for protests. I know a number of Ministers who only wear clerical collars for protests. The logic is that it's important to identify as a Minister when you're supporting something society doesn't expect clergy to. So Ministers will wear a collar at gay prides or pro-choice rallies to make this point. Now I could understand this if it you wore a collar going about your general business, and also did during a protest, but I'm quite uncomfortable with the idea of wearing clerical wear ONLY for protests. The seems to be something worth exploring. I have said before that I'm not in favour of special titles or clothing for religious leadership, mainly because Jesus explicitly said this was a lot of nonsense. Religious leaders should not need these articial crutches. I have no problem with certain liturgical c...

Is humanism theologically tolerant?

OK, well this might be controversial, but I feel the need to say it. Is humanist tolerant? Please note I'm not asking about humanism within society. Clearly humanism certainly believes in tolerance within society and I'm forever glad they are often the only people in the media calling for a separation of church and state. No, what I'm talking about is descriptions of Unitarianism like this and adverts like this , discussed at Peacebang here , which say that humanism is one option, Christianity is another, God is one option among many. The trouble is, humanism, by definition is theologically opposed to theism. This is very different from the relationship between Christianity and Buddhism. These two traditions may be vastly different, but Buddhism, by definition , is not opposed to Christianity, and Christianity, by definition , is not opposed to Buddhism. But humanism is consciously defined in opposition to Christianity and theism. So to say that humanism and theism can bot...