Skip to main content

Elevator speech

As Unitarians, we don't have many religious obligations - but one of them is to work on an elevator speech. Yes it sounds quite American, but "lift speech" doesn't quite sound right. It is an American phrase, presumably from the business world, and I have been made to think about it by reading a sermon by William Sinkford and listening to a sermon by Gini Courter at ConCentric. These are the two most senior people in the American Unitarian Universalist Church right now.

An elevator speech is basically a 30 second speech. You get in a lift with someone, the door closes, and they ask you about your Chalice badge/T-shirt/tattoo. You say, 'It's the symbol of my faith, I am a Unitarian.'
'Oh, what's that?' they say.
You have 30 seconds until they get out of the lift to explain your strange faith. What do you say?

I nearly had this opportunity recently. It was on my flight from Chicago to London. The person sitting next to me asked what I had been doing in the States. I told her I had been going to a Unitarian young adult conference in Iowa. Unfortunately she didn't say, 'Unitarian - what's that?' So I didn't go any further. I didn't want to be pushy, and let's face it the last thing anyone wants is some nutter trying to convert them sitting next to them on an eight hour flight. Anyway she told me she was going on a 'mission' to Africa so I kind of assumed she was well settled in her faith. But then again, you never know.

Anyway, I've been working on my elevator speech. This is what I have so far.

Most Christians believe that Jesus was divine, but Unitarians believe there's divinity in all people, and in some sense all things too. We believe that all people have sacred worth and can reveal religious truth. All people, regardless of gender, race, class, sexual orientation or religion have inherent worth and something to teach us about God. We believe we should join together in radical communities that work for justice and freedom for all people and the Earth and walk together in our spiritual searches by joining our souls together in worship and our minds together in dialogue.

I encourage you to work on your own elevator speech.

Comments

Anonymous said…
"A Unitarian is not a Christian in the same way that a Canadian is not an American."

"Uh?"

"You're on the Internet, right? You can find out all about it there."
Anonymous said…
Please be clear, when making any statements like this, you are expressing your own opinion. This is only a statement of what you believe.

However, it is not what "Unitarians" believe. I assume by using the word "Unitarians" and "we" you are stating what you would like and perhaps assume all "Unitarians" to believe.

I know a fair few who would find the use of what I perceive as overtly theistic and religious language very difficult to go along with.

e.g. divinity, religious truth and God.

One of the essences of being Unitarian is having an individual approach with no imposed strait jackets.
Anonymous said…
I would disagree with Bursting Bubbles. While that may be true in the United States, Unitarianism in the UK is still predominantly Christian, and the writers elevator speech would be apt. (And someone needs to correct me if I'm horrendously wrong)
LaReinaCobre said…
bursting bubbles:
mind sharing your elevator speech?

I think Stephen's was very good. And I am a humanist, agnostic. here is more to what he is sa ing than the words.

I personally have a couple of "elevator speeches," for different situations, depending on what I am feeling.

Popular posts from this blog

Swords into Ploughshares

  "They shall beat their swords into ploughshares, and their spears into pruning hooks; nation shall not lift up sword against nation, neither shall they learn war any more." Isaiah 2:4 Palestine Action are doing just this: beating swords into ploughshares i.e. putting weapons out of use. In doing so they are fulfilling this biblical mandate. They are expressing God's peace as expressed in the Jewish tradition and the Christian tradition. God desires that our swords shall be beaten into ploughshares, that we should unlearn war. That the government wants to make this action illegal has to be confronted in the strongest terms. To rush to condemn attacks on weapons but not attacks on children is perverse. To call attacks on weapons terrorism but not attacks on children is perverse. When government comes to such an extreme position - legislating that peace is war, that weapons need more protection than children - then they have fundamentally gone wrong. This is the definitio...

Is humanism theologically tolerant?

OK, well this might be controversial, but I feel the need to say it. Is humanist tolerant? Please note I'm not asking about humanism within society. Clearly humanism certainly believes in tolerance within society and I'm forever glad they are often the only people in the media calling for a separation of church and state. No, what I'm talking about is descriptions of Unitarianism like this and adverts like this , discussed at Peacebang here , which say that humanism is one option, Christianity is another, God is one option among many. The trouble is, humanism, by definition is theologically opposed to theism. This is very different from the relationship between Christianity and Buddhism. These two traditions may be vastly different, but Buddhism, by definition , is not opposed to Christianity, and Christianity, by definition , is not opposed to Buddhism. But humanism is consciously defined in opposition to Christianity and theism. So to say that humanism and theism can bot...

Clergy-wear during protests

OK, I'm wandering into the territory of Beauty Tips for Ministers here, but a couple of recent conversations have brought up the issue of what clergy should wear for protests. I know a number of Ministers who only wear clerical collars for protests. The logic is that it's important to identify as a Minister when you're supporting something society doesn't expect clergy to. So Ministers will wear a collar at gay prides or pro-choice rallies to make this point. Now I could understand this if it you wore a collar going about your general business, and also did during a protest, but I'm quite uncomfortable with the idea of wearing clerical wear ONLY for protests. The seems to be something worth exploring. I have said before that I'm not in favour of special titles or clothing for religious leadership, mainly because Jesus explicitly said this was a lot of nonsense. Religious leaders should not need these articial crutches. I have no problem with certain liturgical c...