Skip to main content

172 Congregations

It's the time of the year when the Unitarian Directory comes out. This means I can do some number crunching, and thinking about the health of our community.

There are 172 congregations in the Unitarian General Assembly. This is one down from last year (173). Two congregations have disappeared from the directory, though I can't remembering anything being reported about the congregations closing. One is Pudsey in West Yorkshire, and the other is Loughborough in Leciestershire.

The good news is that one new congregation has been recognised this year, Bangor, in North Wales, accepted as a small congregation.

I'm sure that we going to continue to see about two congregations closing every year, I just hope we can see a few more starting as well.

The Directory also lists 133 Ministers (one down on last year) but this is a pretty meaningless number as it includes retired Ministers, and Ministers living in Ireland, America and other parts of the world.

Comments

Anonymous said…
You write;"It would be good to see a few congregations starting too".One of the problems is that the GA seems to do little to facilitate the starting of new congregations - or resurrecting extinct ones - often in large cities.There is a move to start a new fellowship in Canterbury soon - I am not aware that there is any "joined-up thinking" centrally on how to go about starting/sustaining a new congregation - the Bangor congregation seems to have come about through the initiative of a retired minister with little other assistance.The Rock Choir movement (featured recently on ITV)is an interesting comparison; originally a one-woman creation which has spread through carefully planning across many parts of the country ;enthusiastic well-trained leaders with good support drawing in members of all ages.I don't think that growing a church is so dissimilar to growing any other organisation that the GA could not learn something from Rock Choir.
7:54 pm
Andrew Bethune said…
Is it possible for 'ordinary' members of Unitarian congregations to see this Directory? Is it published online, for example?
11:12 am
Stephen Lingwood said…
@Andy The Directory is not online, but there's no reason it couldn't be. It's contents are pretty much "public domain." It is sent out to every minister and secretary to congregations so your congregation should have done. But I would think if you wanted your own copy you could pay to receive one from Essex Hall.
4:10 pm
Andrew Bethune said…
Thanks, Stephen. That's what I suspected. I'll ask at church and see if I can have a look at this publication.
6:33 pm
Anonymous said…
Stephen

I'm not a Unitarian, but I'm interested in different forms of church practice, and I hope that the Unitarians can find a renewed purpose in the UK.

You describe yourself in 'About me' as 'evangelical'. What does that mean in a Unitarian context? (Sorry if you've explained that elsewhere.) Why do you think it's helpful to use such a loaded Christian term? Mightn't it scare off the kinds of people that Unitarians would hope to attract?
12:32 pm
Anonymous said…
Ah I've just seen a post from Feb. 2006 where you explain why you call yourself an evangelical. You want to spread the message about Unitarianism.

But that seems to be more precisely 'evangelistic' rather than 'evangelical'. The two terms are sometimes confused, but it does not help to blur the distinction. Methodists, for example, might support the initiative to develop new kinds of church (called 'Fresh Expressions') to appeal to people in our contemporary society, but they wouldn't automatically see themselves as 'evanglical'. Some would, some wouldn't.

The author David Bebbington has come up with some well-known characteristics to define evangelicalism.
6:54 pm
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Swords into Ploughshares

  "They shall beat their swords into ploughshares, and their spears into pruning hooks; nation shall not lift up sword against nation, neither shall they learn war any more." Isaiah 2:4 Palestine Action are doing just this: beating swords into ploughshares i.e. putting weapons out of use. In doing so they are fulfilling this biblical mandate. They are expressing God's peace as expressed in the Jewish tradition and the Christian tradition. God desires that our swords shall be beaten into ploughshares, that we should unlearn war. That the government wants to make this action illegal has to be confronted in the strongest terms. To rush to condemn attacks on weapons but not attacks on children is perverse. To call attacks on weapons terrorism but not attacks on children is perverse. When government comes to such an extreme position - legislating that peace is war, that weapons need more protection than children - then they have fundamentally gone wrong. This is the definitio...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is humanism theologically tolerant?

OK, well this might be controversial, but I feel the need to say it. Is humanist tolerant? Please note I'm not asking about humanism within society. Clearly humanism certainly believes in tolerance within society and I'm forever glad they are often the only people in the media calling for a separation of church and state. No, what I'm talking about is descriptions of Unitarianism like this and adverts like this , discussed at Peacebang here , which say that humanism is one option, Christianity is another, God is one option among many. The trouble is, humanism, by definition is theologically opposed to theism. This is very different from the relationship between Christianity and Buddhism. These two traditions may be vastly different, but Buddhism, by definition , is not opposed to Christianity, and Christianity, by definition , is not opposed to Buddhism. But humanism is consciously defined in opposition to Christianity and theism. So to say that humanism and theism can bot...
14 comments
Read more

Clergy-wear during protests

OK, I'm wandering into the territory of Beauty Tips for Ministers here, but a couple of recent conversations have brought up the issue of what clergy should wear for protests. I know a number of Ministers who only wear clerical collars for protests. The logic is that it's important to identify as a Minister when you're supporting something society doesn't expect clergy to. So Ministers will wear a collar at gay prides or pro-choice rallies to make this point. Now I could understand this if it you wore a collar going about your general business, and also did during a protest, but I'm quite uncomfortable with the idea of wearing clerical wear ONLY for protests. The seems to be something worth exploring. I have said before that I'm not in favour of special titles or clothing for religious leadership, mainly because Jesus explicitly said this was a lot of nonsense. Religious leaders should not need these articial crutches. I have no problem with certain liturgical c...
11 comments
Read more