Skip to main content

Church growth: where is the hole in our bucket?

I'm crunching some numbers for my church as we approach the end of the calendar year.

We are pretty much stable in terms of numbers and I'm trying to work out what our "limiting factor" is. We're getting about 25 visitors in a year and about 2 new members. I'm trying to work out if we should be working to attract more visitors, or working to convert visitors into members. What kind of a percentage of your visitors can you expect to become members? I read somewhere 15%, which would mean we're doing kind of OK at that, and we should be working to attract more visitors. Or, can we expect to get 25 visitors a year and should be working to get say, 5 new members from that?

Comments

Glen Marshall said…
Forget members - let that take care of itself
Give some attention to attracting visitors - but don't get obsessed
Prioritise helping your people to share faith with their friends
I suppose there's another level in the process: how many visitors come back for a second or third or... time.

But yes, I think there's more conversations to be had about the evangelist-hood of all believers.
Andrew Bethune said…
Numbers can be depressing - so I'd agree with Glen about not getting obsessed.

When I think about it though, the 4churches I have been a member of (2Church of Scotland, 2 Unitarian) have all been in decline numerically.

I think church 3 in my list has turned the corner since I left there ( I hope there isn't a casusal connection!).

When I was at church 2, I got involved in a series of 'alternative' worship events that ran for about 4 years. There was no formal 'membership' of these events, but they attracted a loads of people (some of them cheesed off with normal church, and otehrs wanting a different way of doing things). Numbers built up to high levels (maybe 80-100) and stayed up there.

So I am wondering why this should be.

There may be a lot of factors - but what strikes me as common to both these examples is the variety of different activities being offered which engage with people's lives and spirituality. The activities were/are being actively advertised. In both cases, a sense of community was/is being encouraged.

I don't really know the Bolton situation. Do you have any idea of why your visitors chose to come to Bank Street Chapel? And what made some of them stay? What makes a 21st century person want to belong to a church, which after all, is a rather odd kind of organisation?

Have you thought about geography? I mean, you are a town centre church - but where do your members live? Are they nearby, or are they dotted all over Bolton?

Popular posts from this blog

Swords into Ploughshares

  "They shall beat their swords into ploughshares, and their spears into pruning hooks; nation shall not lift up sword against nation, neither shall they learn war any more." Isaiah 2:4 Palestine Action are doing just this: beating swords into ploughshares i.e. putting weapons out of use. In doing so they are fulfilling this biblical mandate. They are expressing God's peace as expressed in the Jewish tradition and the Christian tradition. God desires that our swords shall be beaten into ploughshares, that we should unlearn war. That the government wants to make this action illegal has to be confronted in the strongest terms. To rush to condemn attacks on weapons but not attacks on children is perverse. To call attacks on weapons terrorism but not attacks on children is perverse. When government comes to such an extreme position - legislating that peace is war, that weapons need more protection than children - then they have fundamentally gone wrong. This is the definitio...

Is humanism theologically tolerant?

OK, well this might be controversial, but I feel the need to say it. Is humanist tolerant? Please note I'm not asking about humanism within society. Clearly humanism certainly believes in tolerance within society and I'm forever glad they are often the only people in the media calling for a separation of church and state. No, what I'm talking about is descriptions of Unitarianism like this and adverts like this , discussed at Peacebang here , which say that humanism is one option, Christianity is another, God is one option among many. The trouble is, humanism, by definition is theologically opposed to theism. This is very different from the relationship between Christianity and Buddhism. These two traditions may be vastly different, but Buddhism, by definition , is not opposed to Christianity, and Christianity, by definition , is not opposed to Buddhism. But humanism is consciously defined in opposition to Christianity and theism. So to say that humanism and theism can bot...

Clergy-wear during protests

OK, I'm wandering into the territory of Beauty Tips for Ministers here, but a couple of recent conversations have brought up the issue of what clergy should wear for protests. I know a number of Ministers who only wear clerical collars for protests. The logic is that it's important to identify as a Minister when you're supporting something society doesn't expect clergy to. So Ministers will wear a collar at gay prides or pro-choice rallies to make this point. Now I could understand this if it you wore a collar going about your general business, and also did during a protest, but I'm quite uncomfortable with the idea of wearing clerical wear ONLY for protests. The seems to be something worth exploring. I have said before that I'm not in favour of special titles or clothing for religious leadership, mainly because Jesus explicitly said this was a lot of nonsense. Religious leaders should not need these articial crutches. I have no problem with certain liturgical c...